Home / Companies / Revvity, Inc. / 28 Apr 2026
Revvity, Inc.: meeting of 28 Apr 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
686 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Revvity, Inc. meeting of 28 Apr 2026. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
10 nominees; 94.9% of reported votes for; 20 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
5,220 vote records from 204 filers. 2 of the 200 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
1,129 vote records from 685 filers. 64 of the 654 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 31 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
522 vote records from 204 filers. 2 of the 200 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
98 vote records from 40 filers. 1 of the 40 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
423 vote records from 173 filers. 0 of the 169 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONSecurity holder
Adopt Share Retention Policy for Senior Executives
522 vote records from 204 filers. 105 of the 200 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 6. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | For * |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against |
| American Century | For | For | For | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | For * |
| Invesco | For | Against * | For | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | For * |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | For * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | For * |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against |
| SEI | For | For | For | For * |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | For * |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | For * |
| Russell Investments | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | For * |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | For * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | For * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | For * |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | For * |
| MFS | For | For | For | Against |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | Against * | For | For * |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Hartford Funds | No report | For | No report | No report |
| DWS | For | For | For | For * |
| PIMCO | For | For | For | For * |
| Allspring | For | For | For | For * |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | For * |
| Janus Henderson | For | For | For | Against |
| Neuberger Berman | For | For | For | For * |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | For * |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Artisan Partners | No report | Against * | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Revvity, Inc. meeting?
686 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 28 Apr 2026. On say-on-pay, 64 of 654 voted against management (9.8%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Revvity, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Revvity, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Revvity, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 28 Apr 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.