Home / Companies / Sanmina Corporation / 10 Mar 2025
Sanmina Corporation: meeting of 10 Mar 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
483 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Sanmina Corporation meeting of 10 Mar 2025. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
7 nominees; 93.5% of reported votes for; 35 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
2,389 vote records from 166 filers. 2 of the 166 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
728 vote records from 479 filers. 100 of the 467 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 12 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
342 vote records from 165 filers. 4 of the 165 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
350 vote records from 170 filers. 10 of the 170 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
To consider and vote upon the stockholder proposal entitled "Proposal 5 - Special Shareholder Meeting...
334 vote records from 161 filers. 112 of the 161 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
1 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 5. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | For * |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against |
| Dimensional | For | Against * | For | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | For * |
| American Century | For | For | For | For * |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | For * |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | For * |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | For * |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | For * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | For * |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | For * |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Against * | For | For * |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against |
| SEI | For | Against * | For | For * |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | For * |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | For * |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | For * |
| Voya | For | For | For | For * |
| First Trust | For | For | For | For * |
| Russell Investments | For | Against * | For | For * |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | For * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | For * |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | For * |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | For * |
| Global X | For | Against * | For | No report |
| MFS | For | For | For | For * |
| Federated Hermes | For | Against * | For | For * |
| AllianceBernstein | Against * | For | For | For * |
| DWS | For | For | For | For * |
| PIMCO | For | For | For | For * |
| Allspring | For | For | For | Against |
| MassMutual | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Harbor Funds | For | Against * | For | For * |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | Against * | No report | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | Against * | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Sanmina Corporation meeting?
483 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 10 Mar 2025. On say-on-pay, 100 of 467 voted against management (21.4%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Sanmina Corporation on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Sanmina Corporation
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Sanmina Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 10 Mar 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.