Home / Companies / ServiceNow, Inc. / 22 May 2025
ServiceNow, Inc.: meeting of 22 May 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,786 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the ServiceNow, Inc. meeting of 22 May 2025. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
9 nominees; 95.5% of reported votes for; 121 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
11,766 vote records from 502 filers. 3 of the 495 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 7 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
3,333 vote records from 1,764 filers. 152 of the 1,705 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 59 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
1,300 vote records from 500 filers. 7 of the 493 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 7 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
323 vote records from 121 filers. 0 of the 120 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
2,275 vote records from 480 filers. 21 of the 473 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 7 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Amend Right to Call Special Meeting
1,259 vote records from 482 filers. 21 of the 475 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 7 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
1,227 vote records from 478 filers. 42 of the 472 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
23 vote records from 9 filers. 2 of the 8 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 6. Proposal | 7. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | Against * | For | Against | For * |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | Against * | For | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| SEI | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against * | Against * |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | Against * | For | Against | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | No report | No report |
| MFS | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| DWS | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| PIMCO | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Allspring | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Virtus | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| VanEck | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Janus Henderson | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Neuberger Berman | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| American Beacon | For | For | For | Against | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Lord Abbett | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Cohen & Steers | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Dodge & Cox | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the ServiceNow, Inc. meeting?
1,786 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 22 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 152 of 1,705 voted against management (8.9%). 2 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by ServiceNow, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for ServiceNow, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing ServiceNow, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 22 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.