TEXT SA: meeting of 18 Aug 2023

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

30 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the TEXT SA meeting of 18 Aug 2023. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

8 vote records from 8 filers. 5 of the 7 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

12.5% for75.0% against12.5% other71.4% against management8 filers11.0% for89.0% against12.4% against management339,218 reported shares

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

35 vote records from 24 filers. 0 of the 22 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

91.7% for0.0% against8.3% other0.0% against management24 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management1,124,363 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

34 vote records from 22 filers. 18 of the 21 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

9.1% for86.4% against4.5% other85.7% against management22 filers10.3% for89.7% against89.6% against management1,118,365 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

562 vote records from 24 filers. 0 of the 22 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

91.7% for0.0% against8.3% other0.0% against management24 filers93.4% for6.1% against0.6% other6.6% against management19,041,923 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

62 vote records from 5 filers. 0 of the 2 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

40.0% for0.0% against60.0% other0.0% against management5 filers32.8% for5.2% against62.1% other45.0% against management121,185 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family	1. Say-on-pay
John Hancock and Manulife	Split or no vote
Harbor Funds	Against *

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the TEXT SA meeting?

30 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 18 Aug 2023. On say-on-pay, 5 of 7 voted against management (71.4%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by TEXT SA on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for TEXT SA

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing TEXT SA with a meeting date within three days of 18 Aug 2023. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 30 Sep 2026.