Vote Scores

Home / Companies / The AES Corporation / 29 Apr 2026

Meeting · year to 30 June 2026857 filers reporting

The AES Corporation: meeting of 29 Apr 2026

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

857 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the The AES Corporation meeting of 29 Apr 2026. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

9 nominees; 94.6% of reported votes for; 26 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

5,061 vote records from 243 filers. 3 of the 240 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

98.4% for0.4% against1.2% other1.3% against management243 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

1,289 vote records from 848 filers. 41 of the 817 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 31 filers reported this item without a management mark.

91.5% for4.7% against3.8% other5.0% against management848 filers98.7% for1.3% against0.0% other0.9% against management598,231,258 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

569 vote records from 244 filers. 5 of the 241 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

97.5% for1.2% against1.2% other2.1% against management244 filers99.8% for0.2% against0.0% other0.2% against management241,962,990 reported shares
4

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

26 vote records from 16 filers. 1 of the 16 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against6.3% against management16 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% other0.5% against management3,080,641 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

If properly presented, to vote on a non-binding stockholder proposal regarding stockholder ability to call...

560 vote records from 237 filers. 118 of the 234 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

49.8% for48.9% against1.3% other50.4% against management237 filers14.0% for86.0% against0.0% other14.3% against management240,198,677 reported shares
6

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

1 vote records from 1 filers. 1 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against100.0% against management1 filers100.0% for0.0% against100.0% against management1,628,200 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor5. Proposal
VanguardForForForAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForForForAgainst
FidelityForForForAgainst
DimensionalForForForAgainst
State Street and SPDRForForForAgainst
American CenturyForAgainst *ForFor *
Franklin TempletonForForForFor *
InvescoForForForAgainst
EquitableForForForAgainst
Charles SchwabForForForAgainst
Nuveen and TIAAForForForAgainst
ProShares and ProFundsForForForFor *
John Hancock and ManulifeForForForAgainst
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForForFor *
J.P. MorganForAgainst *ForAgainst
Goldman SachsForForForAgainst
WisdomTreeForForForAgainst
PGIM and PrudentialForForForFor *
Jackson National fundsForForForAgainst
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForForAgainst
SEIForForForFor *
T. Rowe PriceForForForAgainst
ThriventForForForFor *
Lincoln FinancialForForForFor *
VoyaForForForAgainst
First TrustForForForFor *
Russell InvestmentsForForForFor *
NationwideForForForAgainst
Victory CapitalForForForFor *
Brighthouse FundsForForForFor *
Guggenheim and RydexForForForFor *
Columbia ThreadneedleForForForFor *
BNY MellonForForForAgainst
PrincipalForForForFor *
Capital Group and American FundsForForForAgainst
Pacific Life fundsForForForAgainst
Global XForForForFor *
MFSForForForAgainst
TransamericaForForForFor *
Federated HermesForForForFor *
AllianceBernsteinForForForFor *
Hartford FundsNo reportForNo reportNo report
DWSForForForFor *
PIMCOForForForFor *
AllspringSplit or no voteSplit or no voteSplit or no voteSplit or no vote
MassMutualForForForFor *
Harbor FundsForForForFor *
Janus HendersonNo reportForNo reportNo report
Neuberger BermanNo reportForNo reportNo report
Natixis and Loomis SaylesNo reportForNo reportNo report
BairdNo reportForNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the The AES Corporation meeting?

857 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 29 Apr 2026. On say-on-pay, 41 of 817 voted against management (5.0%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by The AES Corporation on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for The AES Corporation

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing The AES Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 29 Apr 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.