Home / Companies / The Charles Schwab Corporation / 23 May 2024
The Charles Schwab Corporation: meeting of 23 May 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,595 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the The Charles Schwab Corporation meeting of 23 May 2024. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
5 nominees; 90.1% of reported votes for; 85 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
5,168 vote records from 421 filers. 20 of the 416 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
2,884 vote records from 1,556 filers. 202 of the 1,508 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 48 filers reported this item without a management mark.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
1,034 vote records from 419 filers. 13 of the 414 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
125 vote records from 55 filers. 6 of the 52 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONSecurity holder
Stockholder Proposal Requesting Changes to the Executive Compensation Program
834 vote records from 355 filers. 31 of the 353 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSIONSecurity holder
Stockholder Proposal on Pay Equity Disclosure
998 vote records from 407 filers. 164 of the 404 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSIONSecurity holder
Stockholder Proposal on Workforce Discrimination Risk Oversight and Impact
764 vote records from 329 filers. 19 of the 327 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
432 vote records from 95 filers. 9 of the 94 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 5. Proposal | 6. Proposal | 7. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against | Against | No report |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| American Century | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | Against * | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Against * | For | For | No report | Against | No report |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | Against * | For | Against | For * | Against |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | No report | Against | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| SEI | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Voya | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | No report | No report | No report |
| MFS | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against |
| DWS | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| PIMCO | For | Against * | Against * | For * | For * | Against |
| Allspring | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Virtus | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| VanEck | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| Janus Henderson | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Neuberger Berman | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| American Beacon | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | No report | Against | No report |
| Lord Abbett | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Dodge & Cox | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Baird | For | For | For | No report | For * | No report |
| Artisan Partners | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the The Charles Schwab Corporation meeting?
1,595 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 23 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 202 of 1,508 voted against management (13.4%). 3 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by The Charles Schwab Corporation on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for The Charles Schwab Corporation
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing The Charles Schwab Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 23 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.