Vote Scores

Home / Companies / The Chemours Company / 21 May 2024

Meeting · year to 30 June 2024722 filers reporting

The Chemours Company: meeting of 21 May 2024

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

722 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the The Chemours Company meeting of 21 May 2024. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

9 nominees; 97.1% of reported votes for; 19 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

3,056 vote records from 159 filers. 1 of the 156 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

97.5% for0.0% against2.5% other0.6% against management159 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

951 vote records from 706 filers. 23 of the 680 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 26 filers reported this item without a management mark.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided

92.6% for3.0% against4.4% other3.4% against management706 filers98.6% for1.3% against0.1% other1.3% against management131,730,221 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

337 vote records from 156 filers. 6 of the 153 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

94.2% for3.2% against2.6% other3.9% against management156 filers99.9% for0.0% against0.0% other0.1% against management66,026,927 reported shares
4

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

12 vote records from 11 filers. 2 of the 11 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

72.7% for18.2% against9.1% other18.2% against management11 filers80.7% for19.0% against0.4% other19.0% against management80,657 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

1 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management1 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management20 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForForFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForFor
FidelityForForFor
DimensionalForForFor
State Street and SPDRForForFor
American CenturyForForFor
Franklin TempletonNo reportForNo report
InvescoForForFor
EquitableForForFor
Charles SchwabForForFor
Nuveen and TIAAForForFor
ProShares and ProFundsForForFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForFor
J.P. MorganForForFor
Goldman SachsNo reportForNo report
WisdomTreeForForFor
PGIM and PrudentialForForFor
Jackson National fundsForForFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForFor
SEIForForFor
T. Rowe PriceForForFor
ThriventForForFor
Lincoln FinancialForForFor
VoyaForForFor
First TrustForForFor
Russell InvestmentsForForFor
NationwideForForFor
Victory CapitalForForFor
Brighthouse FundsForForFor
Guggenheim and RydexForForFor
Columbia ThreadneedleForForFor
BNY MellonForForFor
PrincipalForForFor
Capital Group and American FundsNo reportSplit or no voteNo report
Pacific Life fundsForForFor
MFSForForFor
Federated HermesNo reportForNo report
AllianceBernsteinNo reportForNo report
DWSForForFor
PIMCOForForAgainst *
AllspringNo reportForNo report
MassMutualForForFor
Harbor FundsForForFor
Janus HendersonNo reportForNo report
Neuberger BermanNo reportForNo report
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForForFor
Harris Associates and OakmarkNo reportForNo report
BairdNo reportForNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the The Chemours Company meeting?

722 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 21 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 23 of 680 voted against management (3.4%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by The Chemours Company on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for The Chemours Company

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing The Chemours Company with a meeting date within three days of 21 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.