Home / Companies / The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. / 8 Nov 2024
The Estee Lauder Companies Inc.: meeting of 8 Nov 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,153 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. meeting of 8 Nov 2024. Their records fall into 4 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
4 nominees; 47.1% of reported votes for; 246 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
3,397 vote records from 285 filers. 49 of the 285 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
2,051 vote records from 1,139 filers. 689 of the 1,096 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 43 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
644 vote records from 284 filers. 10 of the 284 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
670 vote records from 292 filers. 108 of the 290 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For |
| Fidelity | For | For | For |
| Dimensional | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| State Street and SPDR | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| American Century | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | Against * | For |
| Invesco | For | Against * | For |
| Equitable | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Charles Schwab | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | Against * | For |
| Goldman Sachs | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| WisdomTree | Split or no vote | For | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | Split or no vote | For | For |
| SEI | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| T. Rowe Price | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Thrivent | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Lincoln Financial | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| Voya | Split or no vote | For | For |
| First Trust | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Russell Investments | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Nationwide | For | Against * | For |
| Victory Capital | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | Abstain or withhold | Against * | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| BNY Mellon | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Principal | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | Against * | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For |
| Global X | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| MFS | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Transamerica | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Federated Hermes | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| AllianceBernstein | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Hartford Funds | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| DWS | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| PIMCO | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Allspring | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| MassMutual | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| Virtus | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| VanEck | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | Against * | For |
| Janus Henderson | No report | Against * | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | Against * | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Baird | No report | Against * | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. meeting?
1,153 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 8 Nov 2024. On say-on-pay, 689 of 1,096 voted against management (62.9%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for The Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 8 Nov 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.