Home / Companies / The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. / 13 Nov 2025
The Estee Lauder Companies Inc.: meeting of 13 Nov 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,054 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. meeting of 13 Nov 2025. Their records fall into 4 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
6 nominees; 66.4% of reported votes for; 209 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
4,044 vote records from 269 filers. 25 of the 268 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
1,622 vote records from 1,048 filers. 638 of the 1,008 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 40 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
661 vote records from 267 filers. 3 of the 267 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,276 vote records from 266 filers. 2 of the 265 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | Against * | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For |
| Fidelity | For | For | For |
| Dimensional | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For |
| American Century | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Franklin Templeton | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Invesco | For | Against * | For |
| Equitable | For | Against * | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | Against * | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | Against * | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | Against * | For |
| WisdomTree | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Against * | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | Against * | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | Split or no vote | For | For |
| SEI | For | Against * | For |
| T. Rowe Price | Abstain or withhold * | For | For |
| Thrivent | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Lincoln Financial | Abstain or withhold | For | For |
| Voya | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| First Trust | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Russell Investments | For | Against * | For |
| Nationwide | For | For | For |
| Victory Capital | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | Against | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | Against * | For |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For |
| Principal | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | Against * | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For |
| Global X | For | Against * | For |
| MFS | For | Against * | For |
| Transamerica | Split or no vote | For | For |
| Federated Hermes | For | Against * | For |
| AllianceBernstein | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| Hartford Funds | For | Against * | For |
| DWS | For | Against * | For |
| PIMCO | Abstain or withhold * | Against * | For |
| Allspring | Split or no vote | Against * | For |
| MassMutual | For | Against * | For |
| VanEck | For | Against * | For |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | No report | Against * | No report |
| Janus Henderson | No report | Against * | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | Against * | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | Against * | No report |
| Baird | No report | Against * | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. meeting?
1,054 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 13 Nov 2025. On say-on-pay, 638 of 1,008 voted against management (63.3%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for The Estee Lauder Companies Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 13 Nov 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.