Vote Scores

Home / Companies / The GEO Group, Inc. / 3 May 2024

Meeting · year to 30 June 2024326 filers reporting

The GEO Group, Inc.: meeting of 3 May 2024

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

326 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the The GEO Group, Inc. meeting of 3 May 2024. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

8 nominees; 91.6% of reported votes for; 19 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

1,561 vote records from 115 filers. 4 of the 114 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

93.0% for3.5% against3.5% other3.5% against management115 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

452 vote records from 322 filers. 55 of the 302 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 20 filers reported this item without a management mark.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

74.8% for17.1% against8.1% other18.2% against management322 filers
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

194 vote records from 113 filers. 2 of the 112 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

94.7% for1.8% against3.5% other1.8% against management113 filers98.1% for1.3% against0.7% other1.3% against management41,625,075 reported shares
4

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

194 vote records from 113 filers. 2 of the 112 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

94.7% for1.8% against3.5% other1.8% against management113 filers99.3% for0.0% against0.7% other0.1% against management41,625,076 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

196 vote records from 114 filers. 3 of the 113 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

94.7% for2.6% against2.6% other2.7% against management114 filers98.7% for1.2% against0.2% other1.2% against management41,654,846 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSIONSecurity holder

To vote on a shareholder proposal regarding a third-party racial equity audit and report, if properly...

152 vote records from 88 filers. 17 of the 87 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

17.0% for78.4% against4.5% other19.5% against management88 filers3.5% for96.2% against0.2% other3.6% against management35,308,059 reported shares
7

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

36 vote records from 24 filers. 11 of the 24 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

45.8% for54.2% against45.8% against management24 filers2.6% for97.4% against2.6% against management6,014,398 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor6. Proposal
VanguardForForForAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForForForAgainst
FidelityForForForAgainst
DimensionalNo reportAgainst *No reportNo report
State Street and SPDRForForForAgainst
Franklin TempletonForAgainst *ForFor *
InvescoForForForAgainst
EquitableForForForAgainst
Charles SchwabForForForNo report
Nuveen and TIAAForForForAgainst
ProShares and ProFundsForForForAgainst
John Hancock and ManulifeForForForNo report
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForForFor *
J.P. MorganForForForNo report
Goldman SachsForForForAgainst
WisdomTreeForForForAgainst
PGIM and PrudentialForForForNo report
Jackson National fundsForForForNo report
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForForAgainst
SEIForAgainst *ForNo report
T. Rowe PriceAgainst *ForForAgainst
ThriventForForForAgainst
Lincoln FinancialForForForAgainst
VoyaForForForAgainst
First TrustForForForAgainst
Russell InvestmentsForAgainst *ForNo report
NationwideForForForFor *
Victory CapitalForForForFor *
Brighthouse FundsForForForAgainst
Guggenheim and RydexForForForAgainst
Columbia ThreadneedleForForForAgainst
BNY MellonForForForAgainst
PrincipalForForForAgainst
Capital Group and American FundsNo reportSplit or no voteNo reportNo report
Pacific Life fundsForForForAgainst
Global XForAgainst *ForNo report
AllianceBernsteinNo reportForNo reportNo report
DWSForForForFor *
PIMCOForForAgainst *For *
Janus HendersonNo reportForNo reportNo report
Neuberger BermanNo reportAgainst *No reportNo report
American BeaconForAgainst *ForFor *
Natixis and Loomis SaylesNo reportAgainst *No reportNo report
BairdNo reportForNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the The GEO Group, Inc. meeting?

326 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 3 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 55 of 302 voted against management (18.2%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by The GEO Group, Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for The GEO Group, Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing The GEO Group, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 3 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.