Home / Companies / The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. / 18 Mar 2025
The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.: meeting of 18 Mar 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
896 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. meeting of 18 Mar 2025. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
1,356 vote records from 861 filers. 381 of the 811 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 50 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on pay tied to a merger or sale
34 vote records from 22 filers. 10 of the 20 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONSIssuer
EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONS: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
492 vote records from 199 filers. 1 of the 198 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
26 vote records from 14 filers. 3 of the 14 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
667 vote records from 237 filers. 17 of the 236 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Say-on-pay | 2. Merger pay |
|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | No report |
| Fidelity | For | No report |
| Dimensional | Against * | No report |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report |
| American Century | Against * | No report |
| Franklin Templeton | Against * | No report |
| Invesco | For | No report |
| Equitable | For | No report |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | Against * | No report |
| ProShares and ProFunds | Against * | No report |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Against * | No report |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Against * | No report |
| J.P. Morgan | Against * | Against * |
| Goldman Sachs | For | No report |
| WisdomTree | Against * | No report |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report |
| Jackson National funds | For | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | No report |
| SEI | For | No report |
| T. Rowe Price | Against * | No report |
| Thrivent | Against * | No report |
| Lincoln Financial | Against | No report |
| Voya | Against * | No report |
| First Trust | Against * | No report |
| Russell Investments | For | No report |
| Nationwide | For | No report |
| Victory Capital | Against * | No report |
| Brighthouse Funds | Against * | No report |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | Against * | No report |
| Columbia Threadneedle | Against * | No report |
| BNY Mellon | Against * | No report |
| Principal | Against * | No report |
| Capital Group and American Funds | Split or no vote | No report |
| Pacific Life funds | For | No report |
| Global X | For | No report |
| MFS | For | No report |
| Transamerica | For | No report |
| Federated Hermes | For | No report |
| AllianceBernstein | Against * | No report |
| Hartford Funds | For | No report |
| DWS | Against * | No report |
| PIMCO | Against * | No report |
| Allspring | Against * | No report |
| MassMutual | Against * | No report |
| Virtus | For | For |
| VanEck | For | No report |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | Against * | No report |
| Janus Henderson | Against * | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | For | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | No report |
| Lord Abbett | Against * | No report |
| Dodge & Cox | Against * | No report |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | Against * | No report |
| Baird | Against * | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. meeting?
896 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 18 Mar 2025. On say-on-pay, 381 of 811 voted against management (47.0%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 18 Mar 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.