Vote Scores

Home / Companies / The Procter & Gamble Company / 8 Oct 2024

Meeting · year to 30 June 20252,065 filers reporting

The Procter & Gamble Company: meeting of 8 Oct 2024

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

2,065 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the The Procter & Gamble Company meeting of 8 Oct 2024. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

14 nominees; 97.0% of reported votes for; 48 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

19,284 vote records from 485 filers. 8 of the 483 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

95.9% for1.4% against2.7% other1.7% against management485 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

3,843 vote records from 2,018 filers. 188 of the 1,964 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 54 filers reported this item without a management mark.

87.2% for9.2% against3.6% other9.6% against management2,018 filers91.8% for8.1% against0.1% other7.9% against management1,355,763,094 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

1,379 vote records from 479 filers. 16 of the 478 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

95.8% for3.1% against1.0% other3.3% against management479 filers99.3% for0.7% against0.0% other0.5% against management569,876,607 reported shares
4

DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSIONSecurity holder

Shareholder Proposal - Pay Gap Reporting

1,359 vote records from 466 filers. 164 of the 463 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

33.9% for63.7% against2.4% other35.4% against management466 filers6.4% for93.3% against0.2% other6.7% against management568,005,293 reported shares
5

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

5 vote records from 5 filers. 1 of the 5 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

20.0% for80.0% against20.0% against management5 filers16.4% for83.6% against16.4% against management13,532 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor4. Proposal
VanguardForForForAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForNo reportForAgainst
FidelityForForForAgainst
DimensionalForForForAgainst
State Street and SPDRForForForAgainst
American CenturyForForForAgainst
Franklin TempletonForForForAgainst
InvescoForForForAgainst
EquitableForForForFor *
Charles SchwabForForForAgainst
Nuveen and TIAAForForForFor *
ProShares and ProFundsForForForFor *
John Hancock and ManulifeForForForFor *
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForAgainst *ForFor *
J.P. MorganForForForAgainst
Goldman SachsForForForAgainst
WisdomTreeForForForAgainst
PGIM and PrudentialForForForAgainst
Jackson National fundsForForForAgainst
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForForAgainst
SEIForForForAgainst
T. Rowe PriceForForForAgainst
ThriventForForForAgainst
Lincoln FinancialForForForAgainst
VoyaForForForAgainst
First TrustForForForAgainst
Russell InvestmentsForForForAgainst
NationwideForForForAgainst
Victory CapitalForForForAgainst
Brighthouse FundsForForForAgainst
Guggenheim and RydexForForForFor *
Columbia ThreadneedleForForForAgainst
BNY MellonForForForAgainst
PrincipalForForForFor *
Capital Group and American FundsForForForAgainst
Pacific Life fundsForForForAgainst
Global XForForForNo report
MFSForForForAgainst
TransamericaForForForAgainst
Federated HermesForForForAgainst
AllianceBernsteinForForForFor *
Hartford FundsForForForAgainst
DWSForForForFor *
PIMCOForForForFor *
AllspringForForForFor *
MassMutualForForForAgainst
Harbor FundsForForForAgainst
VirtusForForForFor *
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForForForAgainst
Janus HendersonForForForAgainst
Neuberger BermanForForForAgainst
American BeaconForForForAgainst
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForForForFor *
Lord AbbettForForForAgainst
Dodge & CoxNo reportForNo reportNo report
Harris Associates and OakmarkNo reportForNo reportNo report
BairdNo reportForNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the The Procter & Gamble Company meeting?

2,065 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 8 Oct 2024. On say-on-pay, 188 of 1,964 voted against management (9.6%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by The Procter & Gamble Company on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for The Procter & Gamble Company

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing The Procter & Gamble Company with a meeting date within three days of 8 Oct 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.