Vote Scores

Home / Companies / The Procter & Gamble Company

Company · votes reported on Form N-PXname as filed

The Procter & Gamble Company

How funds and institutional managers reported voting their shares, year to 30 June 2026

Filers reporting
2,107year to 30 June 2026
Against management on pay
5.4%108 of 2,010 reporting filers
Same, by reported shares
5.0%shares reported on Form N-PX
Meetings on file
7across 3 seasons
91.2% for5.1% against3.7% other5.4% against management2,070 filers on say-on-pay

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

For the year to 30 June 2026, 2,107 funds and managers listed The Procter & Gamble Company in their Form N-PX filings (3 meetings).

On the advisory vote on executive pay, 108 of the 2,010 filers that reported a position voted against management (5.4%), 1.2 percentage points below the median company on this site (6.6%). By reported shares the figure is 5.0% (median 2.9%). These are shares of the filers reporting on Form N-PX, not of all votes cast at the meeting.

Meetings

Meeting dateSeasonFilers reportingItemsAgainst management on pay
14 Oct 2025year to 30 June 20262,09065.4%
15 Aug 2025year to 30 June 2026310.0%
8 Oct 2024year to 30 June 20252,06559.6%
10 Aug 2024year to 30 June 2025510.0%
24 May 2024year to 30 June 2024310.0%
10 Oct 2023year to 30 June 20241,98089.2%
11 Aug 2023year to 30 June 2024330.0%

Meetings with 20 or more reporting filers have their own page with every item. Dates are as filers typed them; dates up to three days apart are treated as one meeting.

Say-on-pay: this company and the median

year to 30 June 2026The Procter & Gamble CompanyMedian company
Reporting filers voting against management5.4%6.6%
Reported shares voted against management5.0%2.9%

Among filers reporting on Form N-PX. The median is over 3,799 companies with a say-on-pay item reported by 20 or more filers.

How the largest families voted

Meeting of 14 Oct 2025: say-on-pay and each shareholder proposal that could be told apart.

FamilySay-on-payProposal A
VanguardForAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForAgainst
FidelityForAgainst
DimensionalForAgainst
State Street and SPDRForAgainst
American CenturyForAgainst
Franklin TempletonForAgainst
InvescoForAgainst
EquitableForAgainst
Charles SchwabForAgainst
Nuveen and TIAAForAgainst
ProShares and ProFundsForAgainst
John Hancock and ManulifeForAgainst
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForAgainst
J.P. MorganForAgainst
Goldman SachsForAgainst
WisdomTreeForAgainst
PGIM and PrudentialForAgainst
Jackson National fundsForAgainst
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForAgainst
SEIForAgainst
T. Rowe PriceForAgainst
ThriventForAgainst
Lincoln FinancialForAgainst
VoyaForAgainst
First TrustForAgainst
Russell InvestmentsForAgainst
NationwideForAgainst
Victory CapitalForAgainst
Brighthouse FundsForAgainst *
Guggenheim and RydexForAgainst
Columbia ThreadneedleForAgainst
BNY MellonForAgainst
PrincipalForAgainst
Capital Group and American FundsForAgainst
Pacific Life fundsForAgainst
Global XForAgainst
MFSForAgainst
TransamericaForAgainst
Federated HermesForAgainst
AllianceBernsteinForAgainst
Hartford FundsForAgainst
DWSForAgainst
PIMCOForAgainst
AllspringForAgainst
MassMutualForAgainst
Harbor FundsForAgainst
VirtusForAgainst
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForNo report
Janus HendersonForAgainst
Neuberger BermanForAgainst
American BeaconForAgainst
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForAgainst
Lord AbbettForNo report
Dodge & CoxForNo report
Harris Associates and OakmarkForNo report
BairdForNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

By season

SeasonFilers reportingAgainst management on pay, filersBy reported sharesSay-on-pay split
year to 30 June 20241,9939.2%withheld
year to 30 June 20252,0949.6%7.9%
year to 30 June 20262,1075.4%5.0%

Category mix

Share of the vote records reported for this company, by the category filers chose.

CategoryVote recordsShare
DIRECTOR ELECTIONS57,64366.2%
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES17,20019.7%
AUDIT-RELATED4,1094.7%
COMPENSATION1,4831.7%
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCE1,4041.6%
DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION1,3671.6%
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATE1,3401.5%
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES1,2761.5%
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE1,2741.5%

Questions

How did large funds vote at The Procter & Gamble Company?

For the year to 30 June 2026, 2,010 Form N-PX filers reported a say-on-pay vote at The Procter & Gamble Company; 108 voted against management (5.4%). The table on this page lists the position of each of the largest fund families on say-on-pay and on each shareholder proposal that could be told apart in the filings.

Were there shareholder proposals at The Procter & Gamble Company?

Filers reported one proposal from security holders that could be told apart in the year to 30 June 2026. Across them, 8.9% of reporting filers voted for at the median proposal.

Is this the meeting result?

No. The figures are shares of the funds and managers that file Form N-PX, and of the shares they reported. Holders that do not file the form (individuals, most foreign investors, insiders) are not included, so the split here can differ widely from the certified result, which The Procter & Gamble Company reports on Form 8-K.

Where does the data come from?

From Form N-PX filings on the SEC's EDGAR system, grouped by company. Filers type company names and meeting dates themselves; this site groups spellings of the same company and folds meeting dates up to three days apart. Data runs through 23 Sep 2026; the median compares 3,799 companies.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings that list The Procter & Gamble Company, grouped by company. The name is the most common spelling among filers. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026; page built 26 Sep 2026.