Vote Scores

Home / Companies / The Sherwin-Williams Company / 22 Apr 2026

Meeting · year to 30 June 20261,473 filers reporting

The Sherwin-Williams Company: meeting of 22 Apr 2026

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

1,473 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the The Sherwin-Williams Company meeting of 22 Apr 2026. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

9 nominees; 95.3% of reported votes for; 50 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

8,144 vote records from 349 filers. 6 of the 347 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

97.7% for1.1% against1.1% other1.7% against management349 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

2,332 vote records from 1,464 filers. 77 of the 1,419 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 45 filers reported this item without a management mark.

91.2% for5.3% against3.6% other5.4% against management1,464 filers95.2% for4.6% against0.2% other4.6% against management201,359,240 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

910 vote records from 348 filers. 8 of the 346 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

97.1% for2.3% against0.6% other2.3% against management348 filers99.7% for0.3% against0.0% other0.1% against management65,158,923 reported shares
4

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

211 vote records from 77 filers. 20 of the 77 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

72.7% for23.4% against3.9% other26.0% against management77 filers95.7% for4.3% against0.0% other4.3% against management10,382,968 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

720 vote records from 287 filers. 14 of the 285 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

93.4% for5.2% against1.4% other4.9% against management287 filers98.1% for1.9% against0.0% other1.8% against management54,945,839 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

Shareholder Proposal Regarding Shareholder Ability to Call a Special Meeting

885 vote records from 340 filers. 173 of the 337 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

50.3% for49.1% against0.6% other51.3% against management340 filers22.6% for77.4% against0.0% other22.7% against management64,988,972 reported shares
7

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

4 vote records from 4 filers. 1 of the 4 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

25.0% for75.0% against25.0% against management4 filers56.5% for43.5% against56.5% against management3,017 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor6. Proposal
VanguardForForForAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForForForAgainst
FidelityForForForAgainst
DimensionalForForForAgainst
State Street and SPDRForForForAgainst
American CenturyForForForAgainst
Franklin TempletonForForForFor *
InvescoForForForAgainst
EquitableForForForFor *
Charles SchwabForForForAgainst
Nuveen and TIAAForForForAgainst
ProShares and ProFundsForForForFor *
John Hancock and ManulifeForForForAgainst
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForForFor *
J.P. MorganForForForAgainst
Goldman SachsForForForAgainst
WisdomTreeForForForFor *
PGIM and PrudentialForForForFor *
Jackson National fundsForForForFor *
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForForFor *
SEIForForForFor *
T. Rowe PriceForForForAgainst
ThriventForForForFor *
Lincoln FinancialForForForAgainst *
VoyaForForForAgainst
First TrustForForForFor *
Russell InvestmentsForForForFor *
NationwideForForForAgainst
Victory CapitalForForForFor *
Brighthouse FundsForForForAgainst *
Guggenheim and RydexForForForFor *
Columbia ThreadneedleForForForFor *
BNY MellonForForForAgainst
PrincipalForForForAgainst
Capital Group and American FundsForForForFor *
Pacific Life fundsForForForAgainst
Global XForForForFor *
MFSForForForAgainst
TransamericaForForForFor *
Federated HermesForForForFor *
AllianceBernsteinForForForFor *
Hartford FundsForForForFor *
DWSForForForFor *
PIMCOForForAgainst *For *
AllspringForForForAgainst
MassMutualForForForAgainst
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForForForFor *
Janus HendersonNo reportForNo reportNo report
Neuberger BermanForForForAgainst
American BeaconForForForAgainst
Natixis and Loomis SaylesNo reportForNo reportNo report
Lord AbbettForForForAgainst
Harris Associates and OakmarkNo reportForNo reportNo report
BairdNo reportForNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the The Sherwin-Williams Company meeting?

1,473 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 22 Apr 2026. On say-on-pay, 77 of 1,419 voted against management (5.4%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by The Sherwin-Williams Company on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for The Sherwin-Williams Company

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing The Sherwin-Williams Company with a meeting date within three days of 22 Apr 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.