Vote Scores

Home / Companies / The Trade Desk, Inc. / 4 May 2026

Meeting · year to 30 June 2026956 filers reporting

The Trade Desk, Inc.: meeting of 4 May 2026

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

956 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the The Trade Desk, Inc. meeting of 4 May 2026. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

2 nominees; 43.6% of reported votes for; 184 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

1,188 vote records from 229 filers. 82 of the 223 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.

23.6% for0.0% against76.4% other36.8% against management229 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

1,476 vote records from 948 filers. 600 of the 906 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 42 filers reported this item without a management mark.

30.3% for65.0% against4.7% other66.2% against management948 filers28.9% for71.1% against0.0% other70.9% against management346,034,188 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

595 vote records from 229 filers. 2 of the 223 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.

96.5% for0.4% against3.1% other0.9% against management229 filers99.9% for0.0% against0.0% other0.1% against management142,176,477 reported shares
4

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

21 vote records from 12 filers. 7 of the 12 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

41.7% for50.0% against8.3% other58.3% against management12 filers2.0% for15.1% against83.0% other98.0% against management112,924 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

2 vote records from 2 filers. 0 of the 2 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

50.0% for50.0% against0.0% against management2 filers92.3% for7.7% against0.0% against management6,500 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForForFor
BlackRock and iSharesAbstain or withhold *ForFor
FidelityAbstain or withhold *Against *For
DimensionalAbstain or withhold *Against *For
State Street and SPDRSplit or no voteAgainst *For
American CenturyAbstain or withhold *Against *For
Franklin TempletonAbstain or withhold *Against *For
InvescoSplit or no voteAgainst *For
EquitableAbstain or withhold *Against *For
Charles SchwabForAgainst *For
Nuveen and TIAASplit or no voteForFor
ProShares and ProFundsAbstain or withhold *Against *For
John Hancock and ManulifeAbstain or withhold *Against *For
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForAgainst *For
J.P. MorganSplit or no voteAgainst *For
Goldman SachsSplit or no voteForFor
WisdomTreeSplit or no voteAgainst *For
PGIM and PrudentialForAgainst *For
Jackson National fundsAbstain or withhold *Against *For
Northern Trust and FlexSharesSplit or no voteForFor
SEIAbstain or withhold *Against *For
T. Rowe PriceSplit or no voteAgainst *For
ThriventAbstain or withhold *Against *For
Lincoln FinancialAbstain or withhold *Against *For
VoyaAbstain or withhold *Against *For
First TrustAbstain or withhold *Against *For
Russell InvestmentsSplit or no voteAgainst *For
NationwideAbstain or withhold *Against *For
Victory CapitalAbstain or withhold *Against *For
Brighthouse FundsForAgainstFor
Guggenheim and RydexAbstain or withhold *Against *For
Columbia ThreadneedleForAgainst *For
BNY MellonForAgainst *For
PrincipalAbstain or withhold *Against *For
Pacific Life fundsSplit or no voteAgainst *For
Global XAbstain or withhold *Against *For
TransamericaForAgainst *For
Federated HermesSplit or no voteAgainst *For
AllianceBernsteinAbstain or withhold *Against *For
Hartford FundsSplit or no voteAgainst *For
DWSSplit or no voteAgainst *For
AllspringSplit or no voteSplit or no voteSplit or no vote
MassMutualAbstain or withhold *Against *For
Harbor FundsForForFor
VanEckSplit or no voteAgainst *For
Macquarie and Delaware FundsNo reportAgainst *No report
Janus HendersonAbstain or withhold *Against *For
Neuberger BermanForAgainst *For
Natixis and Loomis SaylesNo reportAgainst *No report
Harris Associates and OakmarkNo reportAgainst *No report
BairdNo reportAgainst *No report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the The Trade Desk, Inc. meeting?

956 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 4 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 600 of 906 voted against management (66.2%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by The Trade Desk, Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for The Trade Desk, Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing The Trade Desk, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 4 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.