Home / Companies / Tyson Foods, Inc. / 8 Feb 2024
Tyson Foods, Inc.: meeting of 8 Feb 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
255 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Tyson Foods, Inc. meeting of 8 Feb 2024. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
14 nominees; 74.9% of reported votes for; 189 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
8,638 vote records from 252 filers. 3 of the 251 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
1 vote records from 1 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
616 vote records from 251 filers. 7 of the 250 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal regarding corporate climate lobbying.
605 vote records from 251 filers. 147 of the 250 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal regarding a circular economy for packaging.
602 vote records from 249 filers. 54 of the 248 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal regarding deforestation-free supply chains.
603 vote records from 250 filers. 40 of the 249 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCESecurity holder
Commission Third-Party Audit Assessing Use of Child Labor in Company's Value Chain
603 vote records from 250 filers. 173 of the 249 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
7 vote records from 2 filers. 1 of the 2 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 3. Auditor | 4. Proposal | 5. Proposal | 6. Proposal | 7. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For * | For * | Against | For * |
| American Century | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| Invesco | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For * | Against | Against | For * |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For * | For * | Against | For * |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For * | Against | Against | For * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For * | Against | Against | For * |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For * | Against | Against | For * |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For * | For * | Against | For * |
| SEI | For | For | For * | Against | Against | For * |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For * | Against | Against | For * |
| Thrivent | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For * | Against * | Against | For * |
| Voya | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| First Trust | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For * | Against | Against | For * |
| Nationwide | For | For | For * | Against | Against | For * |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For * | Against | Against | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For * | Against | Against | For * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For * | Against | Against | For * |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For * | Against | Against | For * |
| Principal | For | For | For * | Against | Against | For * |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Global X | For | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Transamerica | For | For | For * | Against | Against | For * |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For * | Against | Against | For * |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For * | Against | For * | For * |
| DWS | For | For | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| PIMCO | For | Against * | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| Allspring | For | For | For * | Against | Against | For * |
| MassMutual | For | For | For * | Against | Against | For * |
| Virtus | For | For | For * | Against | Against | For * |
| VanEck | For | For | For * | Against | Against | For * |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For | For * | Against | Against | For * |
| Cohen & Steers | For | For | For * | Against | Against | For * |
| Artisan Partners | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Tyson Foods, Inc. meeting?
255 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 8 Feb 2024. 4 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Tyson Foods, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Tyson Foods, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Tyson Foods, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 8 Feb 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.