Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Uber Technologies, Inc. / 5 May 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 20251,697 filers reporting

Uber Technologies, Inc.: meeting of 5 May 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

1,697 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Uber Technologies, Inc. meeting of 5 May 2025. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

10 nominees; 95.2% of reported votes for; 79 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

10,544 vote records from 426 filers. 3 of the 422 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

97.4% for0.2% against2.3% other0.7% against management426 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

2,796 vote records from 1,667 filers. 157 of the 1,612 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 55 filers reported this item without a management mark.

86.6% for8.9% against4.5% other9.7% against management1,667 filers79.5% for20.4% against0.1% other20.3% against management1,714,835,011 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

1,057 vote records from 422 filers. 8 of the 418 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

97.4% for1.2% against1.4% other1.9% against management422 filers99.9% for0.1% against0.0% other0.1% against management647,272,957 reported shares
4

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

43 vote records from 22 filers. 2 of the 22 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

86.4% for4.5% against9.1% other9.1% against management22 filers96.5% for3.4% against0.1% other3.5% against management3,011,898 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

2 vote records from 2 filers. 0 of the 2 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management2 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management158,658 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForForFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForFor
FidelityForForFor
DimensionalForForFor
State Street and SPDRForForFor
American CenturyForForFor
Franklin TempletonForForFor
InvescoForForFor
EquitableForForFor
Charles SchwabForForFor
Nuveen and TIAAForForFor
ProShares and ProFundsForForFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForFor
J.P. MorganForForFor
Goldman SachsForForFor
WisdomTreeForForFor
PGIM and PrudentialForForFor
Jackson National fundsForForFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForFor
SEIForForFor
T. Rowe PriceForForFor
ThriventForForFor
Lincoln FinancialForForFor
VoyaForForFor
First TrustForForFor
Russell InvestmentsForForFor
NationwideForForFor
Victory CapitalForForFor
Brighthouse FundsForForFor
Guggenheim and RydexForForFor
Columbia ThreadneedleForForFor
BNY MellonForForFor
PrincipalForForFor
Capital Group and American FundsForAgainst *For
Pacific Life fundsForForFor
Global XForForFor
MFSNo reportForNo report
TransamericaForForFor
Federated HermesForForFor
AllianceBernsteinForForFor
Hartford FundsForForFor
DWSForForFor
AllspringForForFor
MassMutualForForFor
Harbor FundsForForFor
VirtusForForFor
VanEckForForFor
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForForFor
Janus HendersonForForFor
Neuberger BermanForForFor
American BeaconForForFor
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForForFor
Lord AbbettForForFor
Harris Associates and OakmarkNo reportForNo report
BairdNo reportForNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Uber Technologies, Inc. meeting?

1,697 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 5 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 157 of 1,612 voted against management (9.7%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Uber Technologies, Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Uber Technologies, Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Uber Technologies, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 5 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.