Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Ulta Beauty, Inc. / 9 Jun 2026

Meeting · year to 30 June 20261,154 filers reporting

Ulta Beauty, Inc.: meeting of 9 Jun 2026

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

1,154 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Ulta Beauty, Inc. meeting of 9 Jun 2026. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

10 nominees; 96.4% of reported votes for; 23 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

8,639 vote records from 297 filers. 1 of the 294 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

99.0% for0.0% against1.0% other0.3% against management297 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

1,929 vote records from 1,144 filers. 259 of the 1,105 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 39 filers reported this item without a management mark.

73.0% for23.0% against4.0% other23.4% against management1,144 filers84.2% for15.3% against0.6% other15.1% against management42,542,990 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

861 vote records from 296 filers. 6 of the 293 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

97.3% for1.7% against1.0% other2.0% against management296 filers97.2% for2.8% against0.0% other2.7% against management14,989,126 reported shares
4

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

589 vote records from 207 filers. 8 of the 207 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

96.1% for3.9% against3.9% against management207 filers99.8% for0.2% against0.2% against management13,341,138 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

893 vote records from 302 filers. 10 of the 298 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

95.7% for3.3% against1.0% other3.4% against management302 filers99.5% for0.5% against0.0% other0.5% against management14,840,972 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

1,056 vote records from 281 filers. 34 of the 278 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

84.7% for11.7% against3.6% other12.2% against management281 filers84.8% for15.2% against0.0% other15.3% against management14,266,209 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

1 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management1 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management1 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForForFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForFor
FidelityForForFor
DimensionalForAgainst *For
State Street and SPDRForForFor
American CenturyForForFor
Franklin TempletonForForFor
InvescoForForFor
EquitableForForFor
Charles SchwabForForFor
Nuveen and TIAAForForFor
ProShares and ProFundsForForFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForFor
J.P. MorganForForFor
Goldman SachsForAgainst *For
WisdomTreeForForFor
PGIM and PrudentialForForFor
Jackson National fundsForForFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForFor
SEIForAgainst *For
T. Rowe PriceForForFor
ThriventForForFor
Lincoln FinancialForForFor
VoyaForForFor
First TrustForForFor
Russell InvestmentsForAgainst *For
NationwideForAgainst *For
Victory CapitalForForFor
Brighthouse FundsForForFor
Guggenheim and RydexForForFor
Columbia ThreadneedleForForFor
BNY MellonForForFor
PrincipalForForFor
Pacific Life fundsForForFor
Global XForAgainst *For
TransamericaForForFor
Federated HermesForForFor
AllianceBernsteinForForFor
Hartford FundsNo reportAgainst *No report
DWSForForFor
PIMCOForForFor
AllspringForForFor
MassMutualForForFor
Harbor FundsForForFor
VirtusForForFor
VanEckForAgainst *For
Macquarie and Delaware FundsNo reportForNo report
Janus HendersonNo reportForNo report
Neuberger BermanForAgainst *For
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForForFor
Lord AbbettForForFor
BairdNo reportForNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Ulta Beauty, Inc. meeting?

1,154 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 9 Jun 2026. On say-on-pay, 259 of 1,105 voted against management (23.4%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Ulta Beauty, Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Ulta Beauty, Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Ulta Beauty, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 9 Jun 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.