Home / Companies / VIATRIS INC. / 6 Dec 2024
VIATRIS INC.: meeting of 6 Dec 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,331 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the VIATRIS INC. meeting of 6 Dec 2024. Their records fall into 5 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
12 nominees; 94.5% of reported votes for; 101 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
7,496 vote records from 254 filers. 4 of the 253 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
1,900 vote records from 1,312 filers. 704 of the 1,264 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 48 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
628 vote records from 251 filers. 4 of the 250 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
671 vote records from 262 filers. 10 of the 260 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
1 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | Against * | For |
| Fidelity | For | For | For |
| Dimensional | For | Against * | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For |
| American Century | For | Against * | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For |
| Invesco | For | Against * | For |
| Equitable | For | Against * | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | Against * | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | Against * | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | Against * | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | Against * | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | Against * | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | Against * | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | Against * | For |
| WisdomTree | For | Against * | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Against * | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | Against * | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For |
| SEI | For | Against * | For |
| T. Rowe Price | For | Against * | For |
| Thrivent | For | Against * | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For |
| Voya | For | Against * | For |
| First Trust | For | Against * | For |
| Russell Investments | For | Against * | For |
| Nationwide | For | Against * | For |
| Victory Capital | For | Against * | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | Against * | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | Against * | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For |
| BNY Mellon | For | Against * | For |
| Principal | For | Against * | For |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | Against * | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | Against * | For |
| Global X | For | Against * | For |
| Transamerica | For | Against * | For |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For |
| AllianceBernstein | For | Against * | For |
| Hartford Funds | No report | Against * | No report |
| DWS | For | Against * | For |
| PIMCO | For | Against * | For |
| Allspring | For | Against * | For |
| MassMutual | For | Against * | For |
| Harbor Funds | For | Against * | For |
| VanEck | For | Against * | For |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | Against * | For |
| Janus Henderson | No report | Against * | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | Against * | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | Against * | No report |
| Dodge & Cox | No report | For | No report |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | No report | For | No report |
| Baird | No report | Against * | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the VIATRIS INC. meeting?
1,331 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 6 Dec 2024. On say-on-pay, 704 of 1,264 voted against management (55.7%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by VIATRIS INC. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for VIATRIS INC.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing VIATRIS INC. with a meeting date within three days of 6 Dec 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.