Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Viper Energy, Inc. / 19 May 2026

Meeting · year to 30 June 2026584 filers reporting

Viper Energy, Inc.: meeting of 19 May 2026

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

584 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Viper Energy, Inc. meeting of 19 May 2026. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

8 nominees; 91.0% of reported votes for; 44 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

2,873 vote records from 177 filers. 2 of the 174 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

92.7% for0.6% against6.8% other1.1% against management177 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

848 vote records from 579 filers. 220 of the 552 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 27 filers reported this item without a management mark.

56.8% for37.3% against5.9% other39.9% against management579 filers79.5% for20.4% against0.1% other20.4% against management250,960,511 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

359 vote records from 177 filers. 1 of the 174 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

97.7% for0.0% against2.3% other0.6% against management177 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% other0.0% against management93,274,617 reported shares
4

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

95 vote records from 49 filers. 20 of the 48 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

55.1% for40.8% against4.1% other41.7% against management49 filers73.5% for26.4% against0.1% other25.4% against management22,414,261 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

13 vote records from 10 filers. 0 of the 10 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management10 filers99.4% for0.6% against0.0% other0.6% against management31,600 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

263 vote records from 138 filers. 10 of the 136 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

91.3% for7.2% against1.4% other7.4% against management138 filers94.0% for6.0% against0.0% other6.0% against management70,859,670 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForForFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForFor
FidelityForForFor
DimensionalForAgainst *For
State Street and SPDRForForFor
American CenturyForAgainst *For
Franklin TempletonForAbstain or withhold *For
InvescoForForFor
EquitableForAgainst *For
Charles SchwabForForFor
Nuveen and TIAASplit or no voteAgainst *For
ProShares and ProFundsForAgainst *For
John Hancock and ManulifeForAgainst *For
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForAgainst *For
J.P. MorganForAgainst *For
Goldman SachsForForFor
PGIM and PrudentialForForFor
Jackson National fundsForAgainst *For
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForFor
SEIForForFor
T. Rowe PriceForAgainst *For
ThriventForAgainst *For
Lincoln FinancialForForFor
VoyaForAgainst *For
First TrustForAgainst *For
Russell InvestmentsForForFor
NationwideForForFor
Victory CapitalForAgainst *For
Brighthouse FundsForForFor
Guggenheim and RydexForAgainst *For
Columbia ThreadneedleForAgainst *For
BNY MellonSplit or no voteAgainst *For
PrincipalForAgainst *For
Capital Group and American FundsForForFor
Pacific Life fundsForForFor
Global XForForFor
MFSForForFor
TransamericaForAgainst *For
Federated HermesForForFor
AllianceBernsteinNo reportAgainst *No report
Hartford FundsForForFor
AllspringNo reportSplit or no voteNo report
MassMutualForForFor
Janus HendersonNo reportAgainst *No report
Neuberger BermanForForFor
American BeaconForAgainst *For
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForForFor
BairdForAgainst *For

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Viper Energy, Inc. meeting?

584 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 19 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 220 of 552 voted against management (39.9%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Viper Energy, Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Viper Energy, Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Viper Energy, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 19 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.