Home / Companies / Acerinox SA / 5 May 2026
Acerinox SA: meeting of 5 May 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
43 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Acerinox SA meeting of 5 May 2026. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
31 vote records from 10 filers. 5 of the 9 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
150 vote records from 38 filers. 0 of the 38 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
316 vote records from 38 filers. 0 of the 38 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
270 vote records from 38 filers. 0 of the 38 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
272 vote records from 38 filers. 0 of the 38 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESIssuer
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
14 vote records from 5 filers. 0 of the 5 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
22 vote records from 3 filers. 0 of the 3 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Say-on-pay | 2. Auditor |
|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | No report | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | Split or no vote |
| Fidelity | No report | For |
| Dimensional | No report | For |
| State Street and SPDR | No report | For |
| American Century | No report | For |
| Invesco | No report | For |
| Charles Schwab | No report | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | No report | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Against * | For |
| Goldman Sachs | No report | For |
| WisdomTree | No report | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For |
| Lincoln Financial | No report | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | No report | For |
| Capital Group and American Funds | No report | For |
| Global X | No report | For |
| PIMCO | No report | For |
| Harbor Funds | Against * | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Acerinox SA meeting?
43 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 5 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 5 of 9 voted against management (55.6%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Acerinox SA on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Acerinox SA
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Acerinox SA with a meeting date within three days of 5 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.