Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Agilent Technologies, Inc. / 14 Mar 2024

Meeting · year to 30 June 20241,189 filers reporting

Agilent Technologies, Inc.: meeting of 14 Mar 2024

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

1,189 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Agilent Technologies, Inc. meeting of 14 Mar 2024. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

4 nominees; 87.5% of reported votes for; 104 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

3,597 vote records from 346 filers. 36 of the 343 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

88.2% for9.8% against2.0% other10.5% against management346 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

2,048 vote records from 1,163 filers. 121 of the 1,121 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 42 filers reported this item without a management mark.

7 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

85.2% for10.1% against4.7% other10.8% against management1,163 filers
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

896 vote records from 344 filers. 11 of the 341 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided

95.9% for2.9% against1.2% other3.2% against management344 filers99.7% for0.1% against0.1% other0.2% against management113,903,584 reported shares
4

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

43 vote records from 21 filers. 3 of the 21 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

76.2% for19.0% against4.8% other14.3% against management21 filers88.3% for11.7% against0.0% other11.5% against management220,160 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

To vote on a shareholder proposal regarding simple majority vote

685 vote records from 281 filers. 3 of the 13 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 268 filers reported this item without a management mark.

2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided

98.2% for0.4% against1.4% other23.1% against management281 filers99.8% for0.0% against0.2% other15.6% against management92,234,090 reported shares
6

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

192 vote records from 66 filers. 1 of the 6 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 60 filers reported this item without a management mark.

84.8% for9.1% against6.1% other16.7% against management66 filers95.1% for4.9% against0.0% other0.3% against management18,837,870 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor5. Proposal
VanguardForForForFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForForNo report
FidelityForForForFor
DimensionalForForForFor
State Street and SPDRForForForFor
American CenturyForForForFor
Franklin TempletonForForForFor
InvescoForForForFor
EquitableForForForFor
Charles SchwabForForForFor
Nuveen and TIAAForForForFor
ProShares and ProFundsForForForFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForForForNo report
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForAgainst *ForFor
J.P. MorganForForForFor
Goldman SachsAgainst *ForForFor
WisdomTreeForForForFor
PGIM and PrudentialForForForFor
Jackson National fundsForForForNo report
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForForFor
SEIForForForFor
T. Rowe PriceForForForFor
ThriventForForForFor
Lincoln FinancialForForForFor
VoyaForForForFor
First TrustForForForFor
Russell InvestmentsForForForFor
NationwideForForForFor
Victory CapitalForForForFor
Brighthouse FundsForForForFor
Guggenheim and RydexForForForFor
Columbia ThreadneedleForForForFor
BNY MellonForForForFor
PrincipalForForForFor
Capital Group and American FundsNo reportSplit or no voteNo reportNo report
Pacific Life fundsForForForFor
Global XForAgainst *Against *No report
MFSForForForFor
TransamericaForForForFor
Federated HermesForForForFor
AllianceBernsteinForForForFor
Hartford FundsForForForFor
DWSForForForFor
PIMCOForForAgainst *For
AllspringForForForFor
MassMutualForForForFor
Harbor FundsForForForNo report
VirtusForForForFor
VanEckForForForFor
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForForForFor
Janus HendersonNo reportForNo reportNo report
Neuberger BermanForForForFor
American BeaconAgainst *ForForFor
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForForForNo report
Lord AbbettNo reportForNo reportNo report
Harris Associates and OakmarkForForForFor
BairdNo reportForNo reportNo report
Artisan PartnersForForForFor

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Agilent Technologies, Inc. meeting?

1,189 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 14 Mar 2024. On say-on-pay, 121 of 1,121 voted against management (10.8%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Agilent Technologies, Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Agilent Technologies, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 14 Mar 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.