Home / Companies / Air Canada / 28 Mar 2024
Air Canada: meeting of 28 Mar 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
100 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Air Canada meeting of 28 Mar 2024. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
13 nominees; 98.8% of reported votes for; 10 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
1,222 vote records from 60 filers. 0 of the 60 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
68 vote records from 49 filers. 3 of the 42 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 7 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
97 vote records from 60 filers. 0 of the 60 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
183 vote records from 62 filers. 0 of the 62 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
23 vote records from 4 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
239 vote records from 58 filers. 2 of the 5 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 53 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Hold Annual Meetings of the Company in Person with Virtual Meetings as Complements
97 vote records from 56 filers. 1 of the 7 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 49 filers reported this item without a management mark.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
AUDIT-RELATEDSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED
79 vote records from 50 filers. 4 of the 50 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
33 vote records from 8 filers. 0 of the 6 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 7. Proposal | 8. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | For | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | No report | For | Against | Against |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | No report | For | For | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | For | For | For * |
| American Century | For | No report | For | For | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | No report | For | For | Against |
| Invesco | For | No report | For | For | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | For | For | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | For | Against | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | For | No report |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | No report | For | For | Against |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | Split or no vote | For | For | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | For | For | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | No report | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | For | Against |
| SEI | For | No report | For | For | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | No report | For | For | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | No report | For | For | Against |
| Principal | For | No report | For | For | Against |
| MFS | For | No report | For | For | Against |
| Transamerica | For | No report | For | For | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | For | No report | For | For | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | No report | For | For | Against |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Air Canada meeting?
100 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 28 Mar 2024. On say-on-pay, 3 of 42 voted against management (7.1%). 2 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Air Canada on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Air Canada
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Air Canada with a meeting date within three days of 28 Mar 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.