Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Amazon.com, Inc. / 20 May 2026

Meeting · year to 30 June 20262,793 filers reporting

Amazon.com, Inc.: meeting of 20 May 2026

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

2,793 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Amazon.com, Inc. meeting of 20 May 2026. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

11 nominees; 96.3% of reported votes for; 94 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

26,154 vote records from 721 filers. 3 of the 714 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 7 filers reported this item without a management mark.

98.6% for0.3% against1.1% other0.4% against management721 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

5,824 vote records from 2,761 filers. 130 of the 2,687 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 74 filers reported this item without a management mark.

92.1% for4.6% against3.4% other4.8% against management2,761 filers95.3% for4.7% against0.0% other4.6% against management7,854,562,458 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

2,384 vote records from 717 filers. 26 of the 710 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 7 filers reported this item without a management mark.

95.3% for3.6% against1.1% other3.7% against management717 filers99.3% for0.7% against0.0% other0.6% against management2,620,211,075 reported shares
4

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder

Shareholder proposal requesting a report on charitable partnerships

2,264 vote records from 677 filers. 23 of the 670 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 7 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0.7% for96.0% against3.2% other3.4% against management677 filers0.1% for99.7% against0.3% other0.5% against management2,613,721,143 reported shares
5

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

Shareholder proposal requesting a mandatory independent board chair policy

2,262 vote records from 678 filers. 133 of the 671 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 7 filers reported this item without a management mark.

18.9% for79.8% against1.3% other19.8% against management678 filers3.6% for96.4% against0.0% other3.8% against management2,614,302,972 reported shares
6

ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder

Shareholder proposal requesting a report on impact of climate commitments

2,358 vote records from 678 filers. 40 of the 671 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 7 filers reported this item without a management mark.

3.1% for93.8% against3.1% other6.0% against management678 filers0.8% for98.9% against0.3% other1.2% against management2,613,959,314 reported shares
7

ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder

Shareholder proposal requesting additional reporting on impact of data centers on climate commitments

2,269 vote records from 678 filers. 132 of the 671 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 7 filers reported this item without a management mark.

17.0% for79.8% against3.2% other19.7% against management678 filers13.5% for86.3% against0.3% other13.9% against management2,614,830,606 reported shares
8

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

198 vote records from 26 filers. 4 of the 26 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

23.1% for73.1% against3.8% other15.4% against management26 filers44.4% for54.1% against1.6% other13.7% against management3,094,770 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor4. Proposal5. Proposal6. Proposal7. Proposal
VanguardForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
FidelityForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
DimensionalForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
State Street and SPDRForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
American CenturyForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Franklin TempletonForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
InvescoForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
EquitableForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Charles SchwabForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Nuveen and TIAAForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
ProShares and ProFundsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
John Hancock and ManulifeForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForForAgainstFor *AgainstAgainst
J.P. MorganForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Goldman SachsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
WisdomTreeForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
PGIM and PrudentialForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Jackson National fundsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
SEIForForForAgainstFor *AgainstAgainst
T. Rowe PriceForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
ThriventForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Lincoln FinancialForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
VoyaForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
First TrustForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Russell InvestmentsForForForAgainstFor *AgainstFor *
NationwideForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Victory CapitalForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Brighthouse FundsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Guggenheim and RydexForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Columbia ThreadneedleForForForAgainstFor *AgainstAgainst
BNY MellonForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
PrincipalForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Capital Group and American FundsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Pacific Life fundsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Global XForForForAgainstFor *AgainstAgainst
MFSForForForAgainstAgainstFor *For *
TransamericaForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Federated HermesForForForAgainstFor *AgainstAgainst
AllianceBernsteinForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Hartford FundsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
DWSForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
PIMCONo reportForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report
AllspringForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
MassMutualForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Harbor FundsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
VirtusForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
VanEckForForForAgainstFor *AgainstAgainst
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Janus HendersonForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Neuberger BermanForForForAgainstFor *AgainstAgainst
American BeaconForForForAgainstFor *AgainstAgainst
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Lord AbbettForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Dodge & CoxForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Harris Associates and OakmarkForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
BairdForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Artisan PartnersNo reportForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Amazon.com, Inc. meeting?

2,793 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 20 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 130 of 2,687 voted against management (4.8%). 4 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Amazon.com, Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Amazon.com, Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Amazon.com, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 20 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.