Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Amazon.com, Inc.

Company · votes reported on Form N-PXname as filed

Amazon.com, Inc.

How funds and institutional managers reported voting their shares, year to 30 June 2026

Filers reporting
2,818year to 30 June 2026
Against management on pay
4.8%130 of 2,687 reporting filers
Same, by reported shares
4.6%shares reported on Form N-PX
Meetings on file
9across 3 seasons
92.1% for4.6% against3.4% other4.8% against management2,761 filers on say-on-pay

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

2,818 Form N-PX filers reported votes at Amazon.com, Inc. for the year to 30 June 2026, across 4 meetings.

On the advisory vote on executive pay, 130 of the 2,687 filers that reported a position voted against management (4.8%), 1.7 percentage points below the median company on this site (6.6%). By reported shares the figure is 4.6% (median 2.9%). These are shares of the filers reporting on Form N-PX, not of all votes cast at the meeting.

Meetings

Meeting dateSeasonFilers reportingItemsAgainst management on pay
20 May 2026year to 30 June 20262,79384.8%
14 May 2026year to 30 June 20261329.1%
26 Mar 2026year to 30 June 2026520.0%
21 May 2025year to 30 June 20252,6741329.0%
15 May 2025year to 30 June 202520218.8%
22 May 2024year to 30 June 20242,5171931.7%
16 May 2024year to 30 June 20241727.1%
28 Mar 2024year to 30 June 2024320.0%
24 May 2023year to 30 June 2024410.0%

Meetings with 20 or more reporting filers have their own page with every item. Dates are as filers typed them; dates up to three days apart are treated as one meeting.

Say-on-pay: this company and the median

year to 30 June 2026Amazon.com, Inc.Median company
Reporting filers voting against management4.8%6.6%
Reported shares voted against management4.6%2.9%

Among filers reporting on Form N-PX. The median is over 3,799 companies with a say-on-pay item reported by 20 or more filers.

How the largest families voted

Meeting of 20 May 2026: say-on-pay and each shareholder proposal that could be told apart.

FamilySay-on-payProposal AProposal BProposal CProposal D
VanguardForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
FidelityForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
DimensionalForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
State Street and SPDRForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
American CenturyForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Franklin TempletonForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
InvescoForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
EquitableForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Charles SchwabForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Nuveen and TIAAForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
ProShares and ProFundsForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
John Hancock and ManulifeForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForAgainstFor *AgainstAgainst
J.P. MorganForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Goldman SachsForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
WisdomTreeForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
PGIM and PrudentialForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Jackson National fundsForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
SEIForAgainstFor *AgainstAgainst
T. Rowe PriceForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
ThriventForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Lincoln FinancialForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
VoyaForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
First TrustForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Russell InvestmentsForAgainstFor *AgainstFor *
NationwideForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Victory CapitalForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Brighthouse FundsForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Guggenheim and RydexForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Columbia ThreadneedleForAgainstFor *AgainstAgainst
BNY MellonForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
PrincipalForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Capital Group and American FundsForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Pacific Life fundsForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Global XForAgainstFor *AgainstAgainst
MFSForAgainstAgainstFor *For *
TransamericaForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Federated HermesForAgainstFor *AgainstAgainst
AllianceBernsteinForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Hartford FundsForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
DWSForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
PIMCOForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report
AllspringForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
MassMutualForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Harbor FundsForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
VirtusForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
VanEckForAgainstFor *AgainstAgainst
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Janus HendersonForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Neuberger BermanForAgainstFor *AgainstAgainst
American BeaconForAgainstFor *AgainstAgainst
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Lord AbbettForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Dodge & CoxForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Harris Associates and OakmarkForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
BairdForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Artisan PartnersForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

By season

SeasonFilers reportingAgainst management on pay, filersBy reported sharesSay-on-pay split
year to 30 June 20242,53131.7%withheld
year to 30 June 20252,70029.0%18.0%
year to 30 June 20262,8184.8%4.6%

Category mix

Share of the vote records reported for this company, by the category filers chose.

CategoryVote recordsShare
DIRECTOR ELECTIONS76,81749.5%
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES18,35111.8%
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES17,87811.5%
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATE16,50410.6%
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCE11,6077.5%
AUDIT-RELATED6,4204.1%
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE5,3343.4%
DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION1,8741.2%
COMPENSATION2770.2%

Questions

How did large funds vote at Amazon.com, Inc.?

For the year to 30 June 2026, 2,687 Form N-PX filers reported a say-on-pay vote at Amazon.com, Inc.; 130 voted against management (4.8%). The table on this page lists the position of each of the largest fund families on say-on-pay and on each shareholder proposal that could be told apart in the filings.

Were there shareholder proposals at Amazon.com, Inc.?

Filers reported 4 proposals from security holders that could be told apart in the year to 30 June 2026. Across them, 3.1% of reporting filers voted for at the median proposal.

Is this the meeting result?

No. The figures are shares of the funds and managers that file Form N-PX, and of the shares they reported. Holders that do not file the form (individuals, most foreign investors, insiders) are not included, so the split here can differ widely from the certified result, which Amazon.com, Inc. reports on Form 8-K.

Where does the data come from?

From Form N-PX filings on the SEC's EDGAR system, grouped by company. Filers type company names and meeting dates themselves; this site groups spellings of the same company and folds meeting dates up to three days apart. Data runs through 23 Sep 2026; the median compares 3,799 companies.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings that list Amazon.com, Inc., grouped by company. The name is the most common spelling among filers. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026; page built 26 Sep 2026.