Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Arrow Electronics, Inc.

Company · votes reported on Form N-PXARW · SEC company no. 7536

Arrow Electronics, Inc.

How funds and institutional managers reported voting their shares, year to 30 June 2026

Filers reporting
636year to 30 June 2026
Against management on pay
5.7%35 of 609 reporting filers
Same, by reported shares
3.8%shares reported on Form N-PX
Meetings on file
3across 3 seasons
90.2% for5.5% against4.3% other5.7% against management631 filers on say-on-pay

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

For the year to 30 June 2026, 636 funds and managers listed Arrow Electronics, Inc. in their Form N-PX filings (2 meetings).

On the advisory vote on executive pay, 35 of the 609 filers that reported a position voted against management (5.7%), close to the median company on this site (6.6%). By reported shares the figure is 3.8% (median 2.9%). These are shares of the filers reporting on Form N-PX, not of all votes cast at the meeting.

Meetings

Meeting dateSeasonFilers reportingItemsAgainst management on pay
12 May 2026year to 30 June 202663585.7%
6 May 2025year to 30 June 202561555.9%
7 May 2024year to 30 June 202460343.5%

Meetings with 20 or more reporting filers have their own page with every item. Dates are as filers typed them; dates up to three days apart are treated as one meeting.

Say-on-pay: this company and the median

year to 30 June 2026Arrow Electronics, Inc.Median company
Reporting filers voting against management5.7%6.6%
Reported shares voted against management3.8%2.9%

Among filers reporting on Form N-PX. The median is over 3,799 companies with a say-on-pay item reported by 20 or more filers.

How the largest families voted

Meeting of 12 May 2026: say-on-pay and each shareholder proposal that could be told apart.

FamilySay-on-payProposal A
VanguardForAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForAgainst
FidelityForAgainst
DimensionalForAgainst
State Street and SPDRForAgainst
American CenturyForAgainst
Franklin TempletonForNo report
InvescoForFor *
EquitableForFor *
Charles SchwabForAgainst
Nuveen and TIAAForAgainst
ProShares and ProFundsForFor *
John Hancock and ManulifeForFor *
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForFor *
J.P. MorganForAgainst
Goldman SachsForFor *
PGIM and PrudentialForFor *
Jackson National fundsForAgainst
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForFor *
SEIForFor *
T. Rowe PriceForAgainst
ThriventForFor *
Lincoln FinancialForAgainst
VoyaForAgainst
First TrustForFor *
Russell InvestmentsForFor *
NationwideForAgainst
Victory CapitalForFor *
Brighthouse FundsForFor *
Guggenheim and RydexForFor *
Columbia ThreadneedleForFor *
BNY MellonForAgainst
PrincipalForFor *
Capital Group and American FundsForAgainst
Pacific Life fundsForFor *
Global XForFor *
Federated HermesForFor *
AllianceBernsteinForNo report
PIMCOForFor *
AllspringSplit or no voteNo report
MassMutualForAgainst
Harbor FundsForFor *
Neuberger BermanForNo report
American BeaconForFor *
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForFor *
BairdForNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

By season

SeasonFilers reportingAgainst management on pay, filersBy reported sharesSay-on-pay split
year to 30 June 20246063.5%1.2%
year to 30 June 20256195.9%1.2%
year to 30 June 20266365.7%3.8%

Category mix

Share of the vote records reported for this company, by the category filers chose.

CategoryVote recordsShare
DIRECTOR ELECTIONS11,11564.1%
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES2,84716.4%
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE1,77610.2%
AUDIT-RELATED1,2357.1%
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES3341.9%
COMPENSATION290.2%

Questions

How did large funds vote at Arrow Electronics, Inc.?

For the year to 30 June 2026, 609 Form N-PX filers reported a say-on-pay vote at Arrow Electronics, Inc.; 35 voted against management (5.7%). The table on this page lists the position of each of the largest fund families on say-on-pay and on each shareholder proposal that could be told apart in the filings.

Were there shareholder proposals at Arrow Electronics, Inc.?

Filers reported one proposal from security holders that could be told apart in the year to 30 June 2026. Across them, 52.9% of reporting filers voted for at the median proposal.

Is this the meeting result?

No. The figures are shares of the funds and managers that file Form N-PX, and of the shares they reported. Holders that do not file the form (individuals, most foreign investors, insiders) are not included, so the split here can differ widely from the certified result, which Arrow Electronics, Inc. reports on Form 8-K.

Where does the data come from?

From Form N-PX filings on the SEC's EDGAR system, grouped by company. Filers type company names and meeting dates themselves; this site groups spellings of the same company and folds meeting dates up to three days apart. Data runs through 23 Sep 2026; the median compares 3,799 companies.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings that list Arrow Electronics, Inc., grouped by company. The name is the most common spelling among filers; the ticker and SEC company number come from the SEC company tickers file, matched on the exact name. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026; page built 26 Sep 2026.