Home / Companies / ASX Limited / 28 Oct 2024
ASX Limited: meeting of 28 Oct 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
113 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the ASX Limited meeting of 28 Oct 2024. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
2 nominees; 95.2% of reported votes for; 6 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
376 vote records from 97 filers. 1 of the 97 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSSecurity holder
Director elections (nominees put forward by security holders)
2 nominees; 8.6% of reported votes for; 85 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
348 vote records from 92 filers. 10 of the 92 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
89 vote records from 30 filers. 12 of the 28 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
37 vote records from 14 filers. 1 of the 14 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
290 vote records from 84 filers. 2 of the 84 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
22 vote records from 5 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
14 vote records from 8 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Directors | 3. Say-on-pay |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | Against | No report |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | Against | For |
| Fidelity | For | For * | No report |
| Dimensional | For | Against | No report |
| State Street and SPDR | For | Against | No report |
| American Century | For | Against | No report |
| Franklin Templeton | For | Against | No report |
| Invesco | For | For * | No report |
| Equitable | For | Against | No report |
| Charles Schwab | For | Against | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | Against | No report |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | Against | Against * |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | Against | No report |
| J.P. Morgan | For | Against | Against * |
| Goldman Sachs | For | Against | No report |
| WisdomTree | For | Against | No report |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Against | No report |
| Jackson National funds | For | Against | Against * |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | Against | Against * |
| T. Rowe Price | For | Against | No report |
| Thrivent | For | Against | No report |
| Lincoln Financial | For | Against | No report |
| Voya | For | Against | No report |
| Russell Investments | For | Against | No report |
| Nationwide | For | Against | No report |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | Against | No report |
| BNY Mellon | For | Against | No report |
| Principal | For | Against | No report |
| Global X | Against | No report | No report |
| Transamerica | For | Against | No report |
| Federated Hermes | For | Against | No report |
| AllianceBernstein | For | Against | No report |
| Hartford Funds | For | Against | No report |
| PIMCO | For | Against | No report |
| VanEck | For | Against | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the ASX Limited meeting?
113 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 28 Oct 2024. On say-on-pay, 12 of 28 voted against management (42.9%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by ASX Limited on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for ASX Limited
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing ASX Limited with a meeting date within three days of 28 Oct 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.