Home / Companies / Aurubis AG / 15 Feb 2024
Aurubis AG: meeting of 15 Feb 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
57 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Aurubis AG meeting of 15 Feb 2024. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
14 vote records from 11 filers. 0 of the 11 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
77 vote records from 51 filers. 0 of the 51 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
76 vote records from 50 filers. 0 of the 50 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
72 vote records from 46 filers. 0 of the 46 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
230 vote records from 51 filers. 0 of the 51 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
35 vote records from 10 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Say-on-pay | 2. Auditor |
|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | No report | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | No report | For |
| Fidelity | No report | For |
| Dimensional | No report | For |
| State Street and SPDR | No report | For |
| American Century | No report | For |
| Invesco | No report | For |
| Charles Schwab | No report | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | No report | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | No report | For |
| WisdomTree | No report | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | No report | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For |
| Lincoln Financial | No report | For |
| Voya | No report | For |
| First Trust | No report | For |
| Victory Capital | No report | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | No report | For |
| Capital Group and American Funds | No report | For |
| Global X | No report | For |
| Hartford Funds | No report | For |
| PIMCO | No report | For |
| MassMutual | For | No report |
| Virtus | No report | For |
| VanEck | No report | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Aurubis AG meeting?
57 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 15 Feb 2024. On say-on-pay, 0 of 11 voted against management (0.0%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Aurubis AG on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Aurubis AG
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Aurubis AG with a meeting date within three days of 15 Feb 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.