Home / Companies / Banco Comercial Portugues SA / 7 May 2026
Banco Comercial Portugues SA: meeting of 7 May 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
125 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Banco Comercial Portugues SA meeting of 7 May 2026. Their records fall into 10 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
1 nominee; 85.9% of reported votes for; 26 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
318 vote records from 122 filers. 15 of the 119 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSSecurity holder
Director elections (nominees put forward by security holders)
1 nominee; 72.5% of reported votes for; 30 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
173 vote records from 89 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 88 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
52 vote records from 9 filers. 0 of the 8 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,144 vote records from 122 filers. 0 of the 119 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
450 vote records from 122 filers. 4 of the 119 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
307 vote records from 122 filers. 9 of the 119 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
305 vote records from 102 filers. 0 of the 99 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Appraise Management and Supervision of Company and Approve Vote of Confidence to Corporate Bodies
171 vote records from 89 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 88 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (A)
171 vote records from 89 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 88 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (B)
169 vote records from 88 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 88 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Directors | 3. Say-on-pay | 8. Proposal | 9. Proposal | 10. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | No report | For | For | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Fidelity | Against * | Against | No report | For | For | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | No report | For | For | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | Against * | Against | No report | For | For | Against |
| American Century | For | For | No report | For | For | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | No report | For | For | Against |
| Invesco | For | Against | No report | For | For | Abstain or withhold |
| Equitable | For | For | No report | For | For | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | Against * | Against | No report | For | For | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | Against | No report | For | Against | Against |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | No report | For | For | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | No report | For | For | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | No report | For | For | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Jackson National funds | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | Against | No report | For | For | Against |
| SEI | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | No report | For | For | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | No report | For | For | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | Against * | Against | No report | For | For | Against |
| Voya | For | For | No report | For | For | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Nationwide | For | For | No report | For | For | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | For | No report | For | For | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | No report | For | For | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | Against | No report | For | For | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | No report | For | For | For |
| Principal | For | For | No report | For | For | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | No report | For | For | For |
| MFS | For | For | No report | For | For | Against |
| Transamerica | Against * | Against | No report | For | For | Against |
| Federated Hermes | Split or no vote | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| AllianceBernstein | Against * | For | No report | For | For | Against |
| Hartford Funds | Split or no vote | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| PIMCO | For | For | No report | For | For | Against |
| Harbor Funds | Split or no vote | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Banco Comercial Portugues SA meeting?
125 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 7 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 0 of 8 voted against management (0.0%). 3 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Banco Comercial Portugues SA on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Banco Comercial Portugues SA
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Banco Comercial Portugues SA with a meeting date within three days of 7 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.