Home / Companies / Bank of America Corporation / 24 Apr 2024
Bank of America Corporation: meeting of 24 Apr 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,917 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Bank of America Corporation meeting of 24 Apr 2024. Their records fall into 11 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
13 nominees; 95.1% of reported votes for; 110 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
17,164 vote records from 497 filers. 4 of the 492 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
3,890 vote records from 1,880 filers. 155 of the 1,788 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 92 filers reported this item without a management mark.
13 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
1,318 vote records from 492 filers. 19 of the 487 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,414 vote records from 499 filers. 169 of the 494 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSIONSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal requesting changes to executive compensation program
1,242 vote records from 478 filers. 48 of the 473 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal requesting right to act by written consent
1,178 vote records from 454 filers. 85 of the 450 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Report on Climate Lobbying
1,255 vote records from 469 filers. 195 of the 466 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal requesting disclosure of clean energy financing ratio
1,229 vote records from 467 filers. 205 of the 463 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal requesting independent board chair
1,226 vote records from 463 filers. 224 of the 459 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal requesting report on risks of politicized de-banking
1,163 vote records from 452 filers. 29 of the 448 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
256 vote records from 33 filers. 6 of the 33 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 5. Proposal | 6. Proposal | 7. Proposal | 8. Proposal | 9. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against | No report | Against | Against | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | For * | For * |
| American Century | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | For * | For * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | Against * | For | For * | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against | Against | Abstain or withhold * | Against | Against |
| SEI | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | For * |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | For * | For * |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | For * | For * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | Against * | Against | Against | For * | For * | For * |
| Principal | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | For * | For * |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| MFS | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | For * | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | For * | For * |
| DWS | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | For * | For * |
| PIMCO | For | Against * | Against * | For * | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| Allspring | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | For * | For * |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | For * | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| Virtus | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | For * | For * |
| VanEck | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For | Against * | For * | For * | Against | For * | For * |
| Janus Henderson | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | For * | For * |
| Neuberger Berman | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| American Beacon | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | For * | For * |
| Lord Abbett | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Dodge & Cox | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Artisan Partners | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Bank of America Corporation meeting?
1,917 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 24 Apr 2024. On say-on-pay, 155 of 1,788 voted against management (8.7%). 6 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Bank of America Corporation on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Bank of America Corporation
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Bank of America Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 24 Apr 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.