Vote Scores

Home / Companies / BANK POLSKA KASA OPIEKI SA / 24 Apr 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 2025116 filers reporting

BANK POLSKA KASA OPIEKI SA: meeting of 24 Apr 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

116 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the BANK POLSKA KASA OPIEKI SA meeting of 24 Apr 2025. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

9 nominees; 51.2% of reported votes for; 6 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

160 vote records from 7 filers. 3 of the 5 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

42.9% for28.6% against28.6% other60.0% against management7 filers
2

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSSecurity holder

Director elections (nominees put forward by security holders)

2 nominees; 0.0% of reported votes for; 79 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

246 vote records from 81 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 80 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0.0% for96.3% against3.7% other0.0% against management81 filers
3

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

79 vote records from 33 filers. 21 of the 31 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

27.3% for63.6% against9.1% other67.7% against management33 filers75.3% for24.7% against0.0% other24.7% against management12,119,312 reported shares
4

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

166 vote records from 100 filers. 0 of the 98 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

97.0% for0.0% against3.0% other0.0% against management100 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% other0.0% against management16,285,706 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

150 vote records from 84 filers. 60 of the 82 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

13.1% for77.4% against9.5% other73.2% against management84 filers23.2% for76.8% against0.0% other75.1% against management13,212,837 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

7,139 vote records from 100 filers. 9 of the 98 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

93.0% for0.0% against7.0% other9.2% against management100 filers94.6% for1.4% against3.9% other5.1% against management654,180,267 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

266 vote records from 19 filers. 0 of the 15 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

68.4% for0.0% against31.6% other0.0% against management19 filers80.5% for0.0% against19.5% other10.5% against management4,846,935 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
8

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

Approve Collective Suitability Assessment of Supervisory Board Members

132 vote records from 81 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 80 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0.0% for96.3% against3.7% other0.0% against management81 filers0.0% for100.0% against0.0% other0.0% against management11,768,923 reported shares

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Directors3. Say-on-pay8. Proposal
VanguardNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesFor *No reportForNo report
FidelityNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
DimensionalNo reportSplit or no voteNo reportSplit or no vote
State Street and SPDRNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
American CenturyNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
Franklin TempletonNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
InvescoNo reportAbstain or withholdNo reportAbstain or withhold
EquitableNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
Charles SchwabNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
Nuveen and TIAANo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
John Hancock and ManulifeNo reportNo reportAgainst *No report
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
J.P. MorganNo reportNo reportAgainst *No report
Goldman SachsNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
WisdomTreeNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
PGIM and PrudentialNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
Jackson National fundsNo reportNo reportAgainst *No report
Northern Trust and FlexSharesNo reportAgainstAgainst *Against
SEIAgainstNo reportNo reportNo report
T. Rowe PriceNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
ThriventNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
Lincoln FinancialNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
VoyaNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
First TrustNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
NationwideNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
Victory CapitalNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
Brighthouse FundsNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
Columbia ThreadneedleNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
BNY MellonNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
PrincipalNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
Pacific Life fundsNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
Federated HermesNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
AllianceBernsteinNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
Hartford FundsNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
DWSNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
PIMCONo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
AllspringNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
MassMutualNo reportNo reportAgainst *No report
Harbor FundsNo reportNo reportAgainst *No report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the BANK POLSKA KASA OPIEKI SA meeting?

116 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 24 Apr 2025. On say-on-pay, 21 of 31 voted against management (67.7%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by BANK POLSKA KASA OPIEKI SA on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for BANK POLSKA KASA OPIEKI SA

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing BANK POLSKA KASA OPIEKI SA with a meeting date within three days of 24 Apr 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.