Home / Companies / BANK POLSKA KASA OPIEKI SA / 28 May 2026

Meeting · year to 30 June 2026130 filers reporting

BANK POLSKA KASA OPIEKI SA: meeting of 28 May 2026

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

130 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the BANK POLSKA KASA OPIEKI SA meeting of 28 May 2026. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

20 nominees; 79.0% of reported votes for; 8 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

582 vote records from 14 filers. 0 of the 12 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

78.6% for14.3% against7.1% other0.0% against management14 filers

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSSecurity holder

Director elections (nominees put forward by security holders)

2 nominees; 0.0% of reported votes for; 79 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

252 vote records from 84 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 84 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0.0% for89.3% against10.7% other84 filers

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

110 vote records from 42 filers. 30 of the 39 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

21.4% for71.4% against7.1% other76.9% against management42 filers10.3% for89.7% against89.7% against management18,944,959 reported shares

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

187 vote records from 114 filers. 0 of the 107 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 7 filers reported this item without a management mark.

94.7% for0.0% against5.3% other0.0% against management114 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% other0.0% against management21,494,610 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

140 vote records from 88 filers. 74 of the 81 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 7 filers reported this item without a management mark.

5.7% for87.5% against6.8% other91.4% against management88 filers2.2% for97.7% against0.0% other97.4% against management13,756,429 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

7,068 vote records from 114 filers. 0 of the 107 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 7 filers reported this item without a management mark.

94.7% for0.0% against5.3% other0.0% against management114 filers98.2% for1.5% against0.4% other0.9% against management766,767,107 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

255 vote records from 19 filers. 0 of the 14 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.

73.7% for0.0% against26.3% other0.0% against management19 filers92.6% for0.0% against7.4% other0.0% against management10,191,616 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

Approve Collective Suitability Assessment of Supervisory Board Members

150 vote records from 84 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 84 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0.0% for89.3% against10.7% other84 filers0.0% for99.9% against0.1% other14,949,753 reported shares

How the largest families voted

Family	1. Directors	2. Directors	3. Say-on-pay	8. Proposal
Vanguard	No report	Against	No report	Against
BlackRock and iShares	For	No report	Against *	No report
Fidelity	No report	Against	No report	Against
Dimensional	No report	Split or no vote	No report	Split or no vote
State Street and SPDR	No report	Split or no vote	No report	Split or no vote
American Century	No report	Against	No report	Against
Franklin Templeton	No report	Against	No report	Against
Invesco	No report	Abstain or withhold	No report	Abstain or withhold
Equitable	No report	Against	No report	Against
Charles Schwab	No report	Against	No report	Against
Nuveen and TIAA	No report	Against	No report	Against
John Hancock and Manulife	No report	No report	Against *	No report
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert	No report	Against	No report	Against
J.P. Morgan	No report	Against	Against *	Against
Goldman Sachs	No report	Against	No report	Against
WisdomTree	No report	Against	No report	Against
PGIM and Prudential	No report	Against	No report	Against
Jackson National funds	No report	No report	Against *	No report
Northern Trust and FlexShares	No report	Against	Against *	Against
SEI	No report	Against	No report	Against
T. Rowe Price	No report	Against	No report	Against
Thrivent	No report	Against	No report	Against
Lincoln Financial	For	Against	Against *	Against
Voya	No report	Against	No report	Against
First Trust	No report	Against	No report	Against
Russell Investments	No report	Against	No report	Against
Nationwide	No report	Against	No report	Against
Victory Capital	No report	Split or no vote	No report	Split or no vote
Brighthouse Funds	No report	Against	No report	Against
Columbia Threadneedle	No report	Against	No report	Against
BNY Mellon	No report	Against	No report	Against
Pacific Life funds	No report	Against	No report	Against
Global X	No report	Against	No report	Against
Federated Hermes	No report	Against	No report	Against
AllianceBernstein	No report	Against	No report	Against
Hartford Funds	No report	Against	No report	Against
PIMCO	No report	Against	No report	Against
MassMutual	No report	No report	Against *	No report
Harbor Funds	No report	No report	Against *	No report
Virtus	No report	Against	No report	Against

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the BANK POLSKA KASA OPIEKI SA meeting?

130 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 28 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 30 of 39 voted against management (76.9%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by BANK POLSKA KASA OPIEKI SA on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for BANK POLSKA KASA OPIEKI SA

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing BANK POLSKA KASA OPIEKI SA with a meeting date within three days of 28 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.