Vote Scores

Home / Companies / BM Technologies, Inc.

Company · votes reported on Form N-PXname as filed

BM Technologies, Inc.

How funds and institutional managers reported voting their shares, year to 30 June 2025

Filers reporting
64year to 30 June 2025
Against management on pay
39.3%22 of 56 reporting filers
Same, by reported shares
19.9%shares reported on Form N-PX
Meetings on file
2across 2 seasons
59.3% for32.2% against8.5% other39.3% against management59 filers on say-on-pay

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

64 Form N-PX filers reported votes at BM Technologies, Inc. for the year to 30 June 2025, across one meeting.

On the advisory vote on executive pay, 22 of the 56 filers that reported a position voted against management (39.3%), 31.2 percentage points above the median company on this site (8.1%). By reported shares the figure is 19.9% (median 4.0%). These are shares of the filers reporting on Form N-PX, not of all votes cast at the meeting.

Among the largest fund families, 8 voted with management on pay and 9 voted against: Dimensional, Lincoln Financial, Charles Schwab, T. Rowe Price, SEI, Northern Trust and FlexShares, Natixis and Loomis Sayles and John Hancock and Manulife and others.

Meetings

Meeting dateSeasonFilers reportingItemsAgainst management on pay
3 Jan 2025year to 30 June 202563339.3%
20 Jun 2024year to 30 June 2024162not reported

Meetings with 20 or more reporting filers have their own page with every item. Dates are as filers typed them; dates up to three days apart are treated as one meeting.

Say-on-pay: this company and the median

year to 30 June 2025BM Technologies, Inc.Median company
Reporting filers voting against management39.3%8.1%
Reported shares voted against management19.9%4.0%

Among filers reporting on Form N-PX. The median is over 3,794 companies with a say-on-pay item reported by 20 or more filers.

How the largest families voted

Meeting of 3 Jan 2025: say-on-pay and each shareholder proposal that could be told apart.

FamilySay-on-pay
VanguardFor
BlackRock and iSharesFor
FidelityFor
DimensionalAgainst *
State Street and SPDRFor
Charles SchwabAgainst *
John Hancock and ManulifeAgainst *
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertFor
Jackson National fundsAgainst *
Northern Trust and FlexSharesAgainst *
SEIAgainst *
T. Rowe PriceAgainst *
Lincoln FinancialAgainst *
Columbia ThreadneedleFor
BNY MellonFor
MassMutualFor
Natixis and Loomis SaylesAgainst *

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

By season

SeasonFilers reportingAgainst management on pay, filersBy reported sharesSay-on-pay split
year to 30 June 202418not reportednot reported
year to 30 June 20256439.3%19.9%

Category mix

Share of the vote records reported for this company, by the category filers chose.

CategoryVote recordsShare
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES7935.4%
DIRECTOR ELECTIONS6930.9%
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE3314.8%
AUDIT-RELATED2310.3%
EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONS198.5%

Questions

How did large funds vote at BM Technologies, Inc.?

For the year to 30 June 2025, 56 Form N-PX filers reported a say-on-pay vote at BM Technologies, Inc.; 22 voted against management (39.3%). The table on this page lists the position of each of the largest fund families on say-on-pay and on each shareholder proposal that could be told apart in the filings.

Were there shareholder proposals at BM Technologies, Inc.?

No proposal from security holders was reported by enough filers to be shown for the year to 30 June 2025.

Is this the meeting result?

No. The figures are shares of the funds and managers that file Form N-PX, and of the shares they reported. Holders that do not file the form (individuals, most foreign investors, insiders) are not included, so the split here can differ widely from the certified result, which BM Technologies, Inc. reports on Form 8-K.

Where does the data come from?

From Form N-PX filings on the SEC's EDGAR system, grouped by company. Filers type company names and meeting dates themselves; this site groups spellings of the same company and folds meeting dates up to three days apart. Data runs through 30 Sep 2026; the median compares 3,794 companies.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings that list BM Technologies, Inc., grouped by company. The name is the most common spelling among filers. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 30 Sep 2026; page built 1 Oct 2026.