Home / Companies / BROOKFIELD CORPORATION / 6 Jun 2025
BROOKFIELD CORPORATION: meeting of 6 Jun 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
547 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the BROOKFIELD CORPORATION meeting of 6 Jun 2025. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
8 nominees; 90.7% of reported votes for; 89 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
1,901 vote records from 159 filers. 3 of the 157 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
613 vote records from 439 filers. 14 of the 428 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 11 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
239 vote records from 159 filers. 3 of the 157 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
167 vote records from 104 filers. 0 of the 103 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
222 vote records from 150 filers. 3 of the 148 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
181 vote records from 14 filers. 0 of the 6 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Disclose Net Zero Target Achievement Via Transition Strategy Approach
144 vote records from 95 filers. 6 of the 94 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
The Shareholder Proposal set out in the Circular.
50 vote records from 32 filers. 2 of the 31 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
40 vote records from 30 filers. 3 of the 29 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 7. Proposal | 8. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | No report | Against |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For | Against | No report |
| Dimensional | For | No report | For | Against | No report |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | For | Against | No report |
| American Century | For | No report | For | Against | No report |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | Against | No report |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | No report | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | For | Against | No report |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | No report | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | No report | For | Against | No report |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | No report | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | No report |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | For | Against | No report |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | No report | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | For * | No report |
| SEI | For | For | For | No report | No report |
| T. Rowe Price | For | No report | For | Against | No report |
| Lincoln Financial | For | No report | For | Against | No report |
| First Trust | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | No report | No report |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | Against | No report |
| Victory Capital | For | No report | For | Against | No report |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | Against * | Abstain or withhold * | No report | No report |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | No report | For | Against | No report |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | No report | For | Against | No report |
| BNY Mellon | For | No report | For | Against | No report |
| Principal | For | No report | For | Against | No report |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | No report | For | Against | No report |
| Pacific Life funds | For | No report | For | Against | No report |
| MFS | For | No report | For | Against | No report |
| Transamerica | For | No report | For | Against | No report |
| AllianceBernstein | Abstain or withhold * | No report | For | Against | No report |
| DWS | For | No report | For | Against | No report |
| PIMCO | For | No report | For | Against | No report |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against | No report |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | No report | Against |
| Virtus | For | For | For | Against | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | For | For | For | No report | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | No report | Against |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the BROOKFIELD CORPORATION meeting?
547 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 6 Jun 2025. On say-on-pay, 14 of 428 voted against management (3.3%). 2 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by BROOKFIELD CORPORATION on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for BROOKFIELD CORPORATION
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing BROOKFIELD CORPORATION with a meeting date within three days of 6 Jun 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.