Home / Companies / Calix, Inc. / 14 May 2026
Calix, Inc.: meeting of 14 May 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
454 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Calix, Inc. meeting of 14 May 2026. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
3 nominees; 91.7% of reported votes for; 26 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
1,039 vote records from 160 filers. 4 of the 160 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
718 vote records from 450 filers. 28 of the 426 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 24 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
353 vote records from 160 filers. 2 of the 160 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
46 vote records from 30 filers. 6 of the 30 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
320 vote records from 138 filers. 53 of the 137 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
To hold an advisory vote on a stockholder proposal relating to a simple majority vote.
345 vote records from 157 filers. 147 of the 157 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 6. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | For * |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | For * |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | For * |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | For * |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | For * |
| American Century | For | Against * | For | For * |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | For * |
| Invesco | For | For | For | For * |
| Equitable | For | For | For | For * |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | For * |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | For * |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | For * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | For * |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | For * |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | For * |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | For * |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | For * |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | For * |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | For * |
| SEI | For | For | For | For * |
| T. Rowe Price | Abstain or withhold * | For | For | For * |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | For * |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | For * |
| Voya | For | For | For | For * |
| First Trust | For | For | For | For * |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | For * |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | For * |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | For * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | Against * | For | For * |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | For * |
| Principal | For | For | For | For * |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | For * |
| Global X | For | For | For | For * |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | For * |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | For * |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For | For * |
| DWS | For | For | For | For * |
| Allspring | No report | Split or no vote | No report | No report |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | For * |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | For * |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For | For | For * |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | Against |
| Lord Abbett | For | For | For | Against |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Artisan Partners | No report | For | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Calix, Inc. meeting?
454 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 14 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 28 of 426 voted against management (6.6%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Calix, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Calix, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Calix, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 14 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.