Vote Scores

Home / Companies / CESC Limited / 4 Aug 2023

Meeting · year to 30 June 202426 filers reporting

CESC Limited: meeting of 4 Aug 2023

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

26 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the CESC Limited meeting of 4 Aug 2023. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

2 nominees; 30.9% of reported votes for; 21 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

68 vote records from 26 filers. 17 of the 26 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided

19.2% for69.2% against11.5% other65.4% against management26 filers
2

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

4 vote records from 4 filers. 0 of the 4 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management4 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management1,517,213 reported shares
3

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

68 vote records from 26 filers. 0 of the 26 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management26 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management163,627,346 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
4

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

93 vote records from 24 filers. 4 of the 24 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided

75.0% for20.8% against4.2% other16.7% against management24 filers66.0% for34.0% against33.9% against management241,579,629 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

32 vote records from 24 filers. 0 of the 24 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management24 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management80,862,887 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

7 vote records from 3 filers. 0 of the 3 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management3 filers71.1% for28.9% against28.9% against management3,294,963 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Auditor
VanguardForNo report
BlackRock and iSharesForNo report
FidelityAgainst *No report
DimensionalAgainst *No report
State Street and SPDRAgainst *No report
American CenturyAgainst *No report
Nuveen and TIAASplit or no voteNo report
John Hancock and ManulifeAgainst *For
WisdomTreeAgainst *No report
Jackson National fundsAgainst *For
Northern Trust and FlexSharesAgainst *No report
SEISplit or no voteFor
Victory CapitalAgainst *No report
Brighthouse FundsAgainstNo report
MFSForNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the CESC Limited meeting?

26 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 4 Aug 2023. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by CESC Limited on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for CESC Limited

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing CESC Limited with a meeting date within three days of 4 Aug 2023. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 30 Sep 2026.