Home / Companies / CGI Inc. / 31 Jan 2024
CGI Inc.: meeting of 31 Jan 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
121 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the CGI Inc. meeting of 31 Jan 2024. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
15 nominees; 95.9% of reported votes for; 36 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
3,015 vote records from 115 filers. 0 of the 114 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
6 vote records from 6 filers. 2 of the 5 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
200 vote records from 115 filers. 1 of the 114 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
9 vote records from 8 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONSecurity holder
Please Note That This Resolution Is A Shareholder Proposal: Incentive Compensation For All Employees...
189 vote records from 106 filers. 4 of the 105 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Approve In-person Annual Shareholder Meetings with Complementary Virtual Meetings
189 vote records from 106 filers. 66 of the 105 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
20 vote records from 8 filers. 0 of the 8 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 3. Auditor | 5. Proposal | 6. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | Against | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | Against | For * |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | Against | For * |
| American Century | For | For | Against | For * |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | Against | For * |
| Invesco | For | For | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For * | For * |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | Against | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | Against | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | Against | For * |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | Against | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | Against | For * |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | Against | For * |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | No report | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | Against | For * |
| SEI | For | For | Against | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | Against | For * |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | Against | For * |
| Voya | For | For | Against | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | Against | For * |
| Russell Investments | For | For | Against | Against |
| Nationwide | For | For | Against | For * |
| Victory Capital | For | For | Against | For * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | Against | For * |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | Against | For * |
| Principal | For | For | Against | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | Against | Against |
| MFS | For | For | Against | For * |
| Transamerica | For | For | Against | For * |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | Against | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | Against | Against |
| PIMCO | For | For | Against | For * |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the CGI Inc. meeting?
121 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 31 Jan 2024. On say-on-pay, 2 of 5 voted against management (40.0%). 2 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by CGI Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for CGI Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing CGI Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 31 Jan 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.