Home / Companies / Charter Communications, Inc. / 23 Apr 2024
Charter Communications, Inc.: meeting of 23 Apr 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
302 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Charter Communications, Inc. meeting of 23 Apr 2024. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
13 nominees; 75.0% of reported votes for; 201 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
9,246 vote records from 282 filers. 26 of the 281 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
18 vote records from 17 filers. 4 of the 16 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
710 vote records from 280 filers. 8 of the 279 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
714 vote records from 285 filers. 131 of the 283 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
712 vote records from 280 filers. 42 of the 279 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Stockholder proposal regarding political expenditures report.
673 vote records from 269 filers. 169 of the 269 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Stockholder proposal regarding lobbying activities.
670 vote records from 267 filers. 170 of the 267 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
12 vote records from 5 filers. 1 of the 5 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 3. Auditor | 6. Proposal | 7. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For * | For * |
| Fidelity | For | For | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For * | For * |
| American Century | For | For | For * | For * |
| Franklin Templeton | Against * | For | For * | For * |
| Invesco | For | For | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For * | For * |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For * | For * |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For * | For * |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For * | For * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | Against | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Against * | For | For * | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For * | For * |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For * | For * |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | Against | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For * | For * |
| SEI | For | For | For * | For * |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For * | For * |
| Thrivent | For | For | For * | For * |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For * | For * |
| Voya | For | For | For * | For * |
| First Trust | For | For | Against | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For * | For * |
| Nationwide | For | For | For * | For * |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For * | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | Against | Against |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For * | For * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For * | For * |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | Against | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For * | For * |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | Against | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For * | For * |
| Global X | For | For | No report | No report |
| MFS | For | For | For * | For * |
| Transamerica | For | For | For * | For * |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For * | For * |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | Against | For * |
| DWS | For | For | For * | For * |
| PIMCO | Against * | Against * | For * | For * |
| Allspring | For | For | For * | For * |
| MassMutual | For | For | For * | For * |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For | Against | For * |
| American Beacon | For | For | For * | For * |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | Against | Against |
| Dodge & Cox | For | For | Against | Against |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | For | For | Against | Against |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Charter Communications, Inc. meeting?
302 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 23 Apr 2024. On say-on-pay, 4 of 16 voted against management (25.0%). 2 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Charter Communications, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Charter Communications, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Charter Communications, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 23 Apr 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.