Home / Companies / Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. / 3 Aug 2023
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.: meeting of 3 Aug 2023
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
263 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. meeting of 3 Aug 2023. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
7 nominees; 95.0% of reported votes for; 46 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
2,625 vote records from 203 filers. 0 of the 195 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
129 vote records from 61 filers. 4 of the 57 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
375 vote records from 202 filers. 19 of the 194 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
766 vote records from 203 filers. 5 of the 194 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
34 vote records from 14 filers. 0 of the 5 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
481 vote records from 191 filers. 2 of the 33 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 158 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
How the largest families voted
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. meeting?
263 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 3 Aug 2023. On say-on-pay, 4 of 57 voted against management (7.0%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. with a meeting date within three days of 3 Aug 2023. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.