Home / Companies / China United Network Communications Ltd. / 27 May 2025
China United Network Communications Ltd.: meeting of 27 May 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
40 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the China United Network Communications Ltd. meeting of 27 May 2025. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
1 nominee; 32.9% of reported votes for; 26 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
82 vote records from 40 filers. 26 of the 40 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
74 vote records from 40 filers. 2 of the 40 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONSIssuer
EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONS: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
60 vote records from 10 filers. 0 of the 10 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
352 vote records from 40 filers. 0 of the 40 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
385 vote records from 35 filers. 0 of the 35 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
20 vote records from 5 filers. 0 of the 5 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Auditor |
|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | Against * | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | Against * | For |
| Fidelity | For | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For |
| Franklin Templeton | Against * | For |
| Equitable | Against * | Abstain or withhold * |
| Charles Schwab | For | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Against * | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Against * | For |
| J.P. Morgan | Against * | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | Against * | For |
| Thrivent | Against * | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For |
| Voya | Against * | For |
| BNY Mellon | Against * | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For |
| PIMCO | Against * | For |
| Virtus | Against * | For |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | Against * | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the China United Network Communications Ltd. meeting?
40 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 27 May 2025. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by China United Network Communications Ltd. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for China United Network Communications Ltd.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing China United Network Communications Ltd. with a meeting date within three days of 27 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.