Vote Scores

Home / Companies / CMB.TECH NV / 22 May 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 202532 filers reporting

CMB.TECH NV: meeting of 22 May 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

32 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the CMB.TECH NV meeting of 22 May 2025. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

3 nominees; 87.8% of reported votes for; no filer withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

70 vote records from 7 filers. 0 of the 5 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

71.4% for0.0% against28.6% other0.0% against management7 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

30 vote records from 24 filers. 4 of the 20 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

66.7% for12.5% against20.8% other20.0% against management24 filers97.4% for2.6% against0.0% other2.6% against management274,182 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

48 vote records from 7 filers. 0 of the 5 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

71.4% for0.0% against28.6% other0.0% against management7 filers85.7% for0.0% against14.3% other0.0% against management131,758 reported shares
4

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

132 vote records from 5 filers. 0 of the 4 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

80.0% for0.0% against20.0% other0.0% against management5 filers85.7% for0.0% against14.3% other0.0% against management395,112 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

169 vote records from 7 filers. 4 of the 5 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

14.3% for57.1% against28.6% other80.0% against management7 filers24.5% for61.2% against14.3% other71.4% against management461,180 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

48 vote records from 8 filers. 0 of the 6 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

12.5% for12.5% against75.0% other0.0% against management8 filers42.7% for43.0% against14.2% other49.8% against management132,214 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

167 vote records from 7 filers. 0 of the 5 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

71.4% for0.0% against28.6% other0.0% against management7 filers69.2% for11.6% against19.2% other14.4% against management489,386 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForNo reportFor
BlackRock and iSharesNo reportAgainst *No report
DimensionalForNo reportFor
Goldman SachsNo reportSplit or no voteNo report
Jackson National fundsSplit or no voteSplit or no voteSplit or no vote
Lincoln FinancialSplit or no voteNo reportSplit or no vote
First TrustNo reportAgainst *No report
Natixis and Loomis SaylesNo reportForNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the CMB.TECH NV meeting?

32 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 22 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 4 of 20 voted against management (20.0%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by CMB.TECH NV on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for CMB.TECH NV

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing CMB.TECH NV with a meeting date within three days of 22 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.