Vote Scores

Home / Companies / CMS Energy Corporation / 8 May 2026

Meeting · year to 30 June 20261,013 filers reporting

CMS Energy Corporation: meeting of 8 May 2026

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

1,013 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the CMS Energy Corporation meeting of 8 May 2026. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

11 nominees; 95.1% of reported votes for; 29 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

8,240 vote records from 309 filers. 1 of the 308 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

99.7% for0.0% against0.3% other0.3% against management309 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

1,649 vote records from 1,003 filers. 55 of the 974 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 29 filers reported this item without a management mark.

91.3% for4.7% against4.0% other5.6% against management1,003 filers95.1% for4.9% against0.1% other4.8% against management334,370,560 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

752 vote records from 309 filers. 3 of the 308 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

99.0% for0.6% against0.3% other1.0% against management309 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% other0.0% against management135,633,817 reported shares
4

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

188 vote records from 64 filers. 1 of the 64 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

95.3% for0.0% against4.7% other1.6% against management64 filers99.9% for0.0% against0.1% other1.2% against management23,707,289 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

750 vote records from 307 filers. 11 of the 306 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

96.4% for3.6% against3.6% against management307 filers99.6% for0.4% against0.0% other0.4% against management135,629,044 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

29 vote records from 17 filers. 0 of the 17 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management17 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% other0.0% against management886,855 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

578 vote records from 257 filers. 10 of the 255 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

95.3% for3.9% against0.8% other3.9% against management257 filers99.2% for0.8% against0.0% other0.6% against management111,820,667 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
8

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

Vote on a Shareholder Proposal: Shareholder Right to Act by Written Consent.

728 vote records from 294 filers. 143 of the 293 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

47.6% for52.0% against0.3% other48.8% against management294 filers20.2% for79.8% against0.0% other20.2% against management134,419,339 reported shares
9

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

9 vote records from 6 filers. 1 of the 6 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

16.7% for83.3% against16.7% against management6 filers6.4% for93.6% against6.4% against management743,781 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor8. Proposal
VanguardForForForAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForForForAgainst
FidelityForForForAgainst
DimensionalForForForFor *
State Street and SPDRForForForAgainst
American CenturyForForForFor *
Franklin TempletonForForForAgainst
InvescoForForForFor *
EquitableForForForAgainst
Charles SchwabForForForAgainst
Nuveen and TIAAForForForAgainst
ProShares and ProFundsForForForFor *
John Hancock and ManulifeForForForAgainst
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForAgainst *ForFor *
J.P. MorganForForForAgainst
Goldman SachsForAgainst *ForAgainst
WisdomTreeForForForFor *
PGIM and PrudentialForForForFor *
Jackson National fundsForForForAgainst
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForForAgainst
SEIForForForAgainst
T. Rowe PriceForForForAgainst
ThriventForForForFor *
Lincoln FinancialForForForFor *
VoyaForForForFor *
First TrustForForForFor *
Russell InvestmentsForForForAgainst
NationwideForForForAgainst
Victory CapitalForForForFor *
Brighthouse FundsForForForFor *
Guggenheim and RydexForForForFor *
Columbia ThreadneedleForForForFor *
BNY MellonForForForFor *
PrincipalForForForFor *
Capital Group and American FundsNo reportForNo reportNo report
Pacific Life fundsForForForAgainst
Global XForForForAgainst
MFSForForForAgainst
TransamericaForForForAgainst
AllianceBernsteinForForForAgainst
Hartford FundsForForForAgainst
DWSForForForFor *
PIMCOForForForFor *
AllspringForForForAgainst
MassMutualForForForAgainst
VirtusForForForFor *
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForForForFor *
Janus HendersonNo reportForNo reportNo report
Neuberger BermanForForForAgainst
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForForForFor *
Lord AbbettForForForAgainst
BairdNo reportForNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the CMS Energy Corporation meeting?

1,013 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 8 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 55 of 974 voted against management (5.6%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by CMS Energy Corporation on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for CMS Energy Corporation

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing CMS Energy Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 8 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.