Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Commercial International Bank - Egypt (CIB) SAE / 23 Mar 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 202532 filers reporting

Commercial International Bank - Egypt (CIB) SAE: meeting of 23 Mar 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

32 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Commercial International Bank - Egypt (CIB) SAE meeting of 23 Mar 2025. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

1 nominee; 89.2% of reported votes for; no filer withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

39 vote records from 28 filers. 0 of the 23 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.

82.1% for0.0% against17.9% other0.0% against management28 filers
2

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

46 vote records from 32 filers. 0 of the 27 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.

84.4% for0.0% against15.6% other0.0% against management32 filers94.5% for0.0% against5.5% other0.0% against management56,581,012 reported shares
3

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

62 vote records from 31 filers. 0 of the 26 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.

83.9% for0.0% against16.1% other0.0% against management31 filers92.0% for0.0% against8.0% other0.0% against management77,420,024 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
4

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

75 vote records from 32 filers. 0 of the 27 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.

84.4% for0.0% against15.6% other0.0% against management32 filers96.6% for0.0% against3.4% other0.0% against management91,671,574 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

258 vote records from 31 filers. 0 of the 26 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.

83.9% for0.0% against16.1% other0.0% against management31 filers94.1% for0.0% against5.9% other0.0% against management317,048,418 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESIssuer

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

46 vote records from 32 filers. 5 of the 27 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.

68.8% for0.0% against31.3% other18.5% against management32 filers78.4% for0.0% against21.6% other17.1% against management56,581,012 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

26 vote records from 4 filers. 0 of the 4 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management4 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management33,005,043 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Auditor
FidelityForFor
DimensionalForFor
State Street and SPDRForFor
American CenturyForFor
EquitableForFor
Charles SchwabForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForFor
Goldman SachsForFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForFor
SEIForFor
ThriventForFor
Capital Group and American FundsSplit or no voteSplit or no vote
Federated HermesSplit or no voteSplit or no vote
VanEckForFor
Artisan PartnersForFor

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Commercial International Bank - Egypt (CIB) SAE meeting?

32 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 23 Mar 2025. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Commercial International Bank - Egypt (CIB) SAE on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Commercial International Bank - Egypt (CIB) SAE

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Commercial International Bank - Egypt (CIB) SAE with a meeting date within three days of 23 Mar 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.