Home / Companies / ConocoPhillips / 14 May 2024
ConocoPhillips: meeting of 14 May 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,747 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the ConocoPhillips meeting of 14 May 2024. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
12 nominees; 95.9% of reported votes for; 119 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
15,641 vote records from 472 filers. 1 of the 467 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
3,298 vote records from 1,708 filers. 63 of the 1,648 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 60 filers reported this item without a management mark.
5 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
1,303 vote records from 468 filers. 19 of the 463 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
245 vote records from 88 filers. 1 of the 85 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
98 vote records from 37 filers. 2 of the 37 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Revisit Pay Incentives for GHG Emission Reductions.
1,231 vote records from 448 filers. 23 of the 445 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Simple Majority Vote.
941 vote records from 346 filers. 1 of the 345 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
102 vote records from 34 filers. 6 of the 34 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 6. Proposal | 7. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against | No report |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against | For |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | Against | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against | For |
| American Century | For | For | For | Against | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | Against | For |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against | For |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | Against | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | Against | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against | No report |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | Against | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | For |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | Against | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against | For |
| SEI | For | For | For | Against | For |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against | For |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against | For |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against | For |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against | For |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | Against | For |
| Nationwide | For | For | Against * | Against | For |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | Against | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | Against | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against | For |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | Against * | Against | For |
| Principal | For | For | For | Against | For |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | For | Against | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against | For |
| Global X | For | For | For | No report | No report |
| MFS | For | For | For | Against | For |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | Against | For |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | Against | For |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | Against | For |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For | Against | For |
| DWS | For | For | For | Against | For |
| PIMCO | For | For | Against * | Against | For |
| Allspring | For | For | For | Against | For |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against | For |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | Against | No report |
| Virtus | For | For | For | Against | For |
| VanEck | For | For | For | Against | For |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For | For | Against | For |
| Janus Henderson | For | For | For | Against | For |
| Neuberger Berman | For | For | For | Against | For |
| American Beacon | For | For | For | Against | For |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | Against | No report |
| Lord Abbett | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Cohen & Steers | For | For | For | Against | No report |
| Dodge & Cox | For | For | For | Against | For |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | For | For | For | Against | For |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the ConocoPhillips meeting?
1,747 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 14 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 63 of 1,648 voted against management (3.8%). 2 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by ConocoPhillips on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for ConocoPhillips
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing ConocoPhillips with a meeting date within three days of 14 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.