Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Coromandel International Limited / 24 Jul 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 202668 filers reporting

Coromandel International Limited: meeting of 24 Jul 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

68 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Coromandel International Limited meeting of 24 Jul 2025. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

1 nominee; 66.7% of reported votes for; 22 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

108 vote records from 68 filers. 22 of the 67 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

67.6% for32.4% against32.8% against management68 filers
2

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

142 vote records from 68 filers. 0 of the 67 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management68 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management14,826,027 reported shares
3

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

108 vote records from 68 filers. 0 of the 67 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management68 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management11,299,339 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
4

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

74 vote records from 48 filers. 0 of the 47 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management48 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management7,772,651 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

204 vote records from 62 filers. 0 of the 61 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management62 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management22,496,170 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

12 vote records from 6 filers. 0 of the 6 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management6 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management102,508 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Auditor
VanguardForFor
BlackRock and iSharesAgainst *For
FidelityForFor
DimensionalForFor
State Street and SPDRForFor
American CenturyForFor
Franklin TempletonForFor
InvescoAgainst *For
EquitableAgainst *For
Charles SchwabForFor
Nuveen and TIAAAgainst *For
John Hancock and ManulifeForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertAgainst *For
J.P. MorganForFor
Goldman SachsForFor
WisdomTreeForFor
PGIM and PrudentialForFor
Jackson National fundsForFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesAgainst *For
SEIForFor
Lincoln FinancialForFor
VoyaAgainst *For
First TrustForFor
NationwideForFor
Victory CapitalForFor
Brighthouse FundsForFor
BNY MellonForFor
Pacific Life fundsForFor
AllianceBernsteinAgainst *For
Hartford FundsAgainst *For
PIMCOForFor

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Coromandel International Limited meeting?

68 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 24 Jul 2025. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Coromandel International Limited on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Coromandel International Limited

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Coromandel International Limited with a meeting date within three days of 24 Jul 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.