Home / Companies / De'Longhi SpA / 30 Apr 2025
De'Longhi SpA: meeting of 30 Apr 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
51 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the De'Longhi SpA meeting of 30 Apr 2025. Their records fall into 13 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
2 nominees; 69.1% of reported votes for; 8 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
73 vote records from 10 filers. 1 of the 3 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 7 filers reported this item without a management mark.
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSSecurity holder
Director elections (nominees put forward by security holders)
3 nominees; 41.0% of reported votes for; 28 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
122 vote records from 30 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 30 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
64 vote records from 16 filers. 2 of the 14 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
166 vote records from 38 filers. 0 of the 38 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
135 vote records from 38 filers. 0 of the 38 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
301 vote records from 38 filers. 28 of the 38 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
AUDIT-RELATEDSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED (A)
51 vote records from 31 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 31 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED (B)
48 vote records from 29 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 29 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (A)
40 vote records from 28 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 28 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (B)
40 vote records from 28 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 28 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Fix Board Terms for Directors
40 vote records from 28 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 28 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Fix Number of Directors
40 vote records from 28 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 28 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
11 vote records from 3 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Directors | 3. Say-on-pay | 7. Proposal | 8. Proposal | 9. Proposal | 10. Proposal | 11. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | Split or no vote | For | No report | Against | For | For | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | No report | For | Against | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Fidelity | No report | Against | No report | Against | For | For | For | For |
| State Street and SPDR | No report | Against | No report | Against | For | For | For | For |
| American Century | No report | Against | No report | Against | For | For | For | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | No report | Against | No report | Against | For | For | For | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | No report | Against | No report | Against | For | For | For | For |
| J.P. Morgan | No report | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Goldman Sachs | No report | Against | No report | Against | For | For | For | For |
| WisdomTree | No report | Against | No report | Against | For | For | For | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | No report | For | For | Against | For | For | For | For |
| SEI | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Voya | No report | For | No report | Against | For | For | For | For |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Nationwide | Split or no vote | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Victory Capital | No report | Against | No report | Against | For | For | For | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | No report | Against | No report | Against | For | For | For | For |
| Allspring | No report | Against | No report | Against | For | For | For | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the De'Longhi SpA meeting?
51 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 30 Apr 2025. On say-on-pay, 2 of 14 voted against management (14.3%). 6 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by De'Longhi SpA on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for De'Longhi SpA
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing De'Longhi SpA with a meeting date within three days of 30 Apr 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.