Home / Companies / Dollar General Corporation / 28 May 2026
Dollar General Corporation: meeting of 28 May 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,203 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Dollar General Corporation meeting of 28 May 2026. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
9 nominees; 95.3% of reported votes for; 28 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
7,690 vote records from 298 filers. 2 of the 293 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
1,992 vote records from 1,197 filers. 62 of the 1,156 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 41 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
856 vote records from 297 filers. 6 of the 292 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
26 vote records from 15 filers. 0 of the 15 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCEIssuer
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
27 vote records from 15 filers. 7 of the 15 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
To vote on a shareholder proposal asking the Board to take the steps necessary to reduce the minimum...
833 vote records from 288 filers. 148 of the 283 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCESecurity holder
To vote on a shareholder proposal asking the Board to report on the feasibility of adopting a...
826 vote records from 288 filers. 78 of the 283 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
823 vote records from 286 filers. 59 of the 281 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
6 vote records from 4 filers. 0 of the 4 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 6. Proposal | 7. Proposal | 8. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | For | For | For * | For * | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | For * | For * | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | For * | For * | Against |
| J.P. Morgan | For | Against * | For | Against | For * | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | For * | For * | For * |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| SEI | For | For | For | For * | For * | For * |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | For * | For * | For * |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | For * | Against * | Against * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | For * | For * | For * |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | For * | For * | For * |
| MFS | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | For * | Against | For * |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | For * | For * | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | Against * | For * | For * | For * |
| DWS | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against |
| PIMCO | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against |
| Allspring | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Virtus | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against |
| VanEck | For | For | For | For * | For * | For * |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Janus Henderson | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against |
| Lord Abbett | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Dollar General Corporation meeting?
1,203 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 28 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 62 of 1,156 voted against management (5.4%). 3 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Dollar General Corporation on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Dollar General Corporation
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Dollar General Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 28 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.