Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Domino's Pizza, Inc.

Company · votes reported on Form N-PXDPZ · SEC company no. 1286681

Domino's Pizza, Inc.

How funds and institutional managers reported voting their shares, year to 30 June 2026

Filers reporting
940year to 30 June 2026
Against management on pay
7.7%69 of 898 reporting filers
Same, by reported shares
4.1%shares reported on Form N-PX
Meetings on file
4across 3 seasons
88.6% for7.8% against3.7% other7.7% against management929 filers on say-on-pay

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

For the year to 30 June 2026, 940 funds and managers listed Domino's Pizza, Inc. in their Form N-PX filings (2 meetings).

On the advisory vote on executive pay, 69 of the 898 filers that reported a position voted against management (7.7%), 1.1 percentage points above the median company on this site (6.6%). By reported shares the figure is 4.1% (median 2.9%). These are shares of the filers reporting on Form N-PX, not of all votes cast at the meeting.

Meetings

Meeting dateSeasonFilers reportingItemsAgainst management on pay
21 Apr 2026year to 30 June 202693577.7%
23 Apr 2025year to 30 June 2025881610.3%
1 May 2024year to 30 June 2024410.0%
25 Apr 2024year to 30 June 2024847510.5%

Meetings with 20 or more reporting filers have their own page with every item. Dates are as filers typed them; dates up to three days apart are treated as one meeting.

Say-on-pay: this company and the median

year to 30 June 2026Domino's Pizza, Inc.Median company
Reporting filers voting against management7.7%6.6%
Reported shares voted against management4.1%2.9%

Among filers reporting on Form N-PX. The median is over 3,799 companies with a say-on-pay item reported by 20 or more filers.

How the largest families voted

Meeting of 21 Apr 2026: say-on-pay and each shareholder proposal that could be told apart.

FamilySay-on-payProposal AProposal B
VanguardForAgainstAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForAgainstNo report
FidelityForAgainstFor *
DimensionalForAgainstAgainst
State Street and SPDRForAgainstAgainst
American CenturyForAgainstAgainst
Franklin TempletonForFor *Against
InvescoForFor *Against
EquitableForFor *Against
Charles SchwabForAgainstFor *
Nuveen and TIAAForFor *For *
ProShares and ProFundsForFor *Against
John Hancock and ManulifeForAgainstAgainst
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForAgainstAgainst
J.P. MorganForAgainstAgainst
Goldman SachsForAgainstAgainst
WisdomTreeForAgainstAgainst
PGIM and PrudentialForAgainstAgainst
Jackson National fundsForFor *Against
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForAgainstAgainst
SEIForFor *For *
T. Rowe PriceForFor *Against
ThriventForFor *Against
Lincoln FinancialForFor *Against
VoyaForAgainstAgainst
First TrustForFor *Against
Russell InvestmentsForFor *For *
NationwideForFor *Against
Victory CapitalForFor *Against
Brighthouse FundsForFor *Against *
Guggenheim and RydexForFor *Against
Columbia ThreadneedleForFor *Against
BNY MellonForAgainstAgainst
PrincipalForAgainstAgainst
Pacific Life fundsForFor *For *
Global XForFor *For *
TransamericaForAgainstAgainst
Federated HermesForFor *For *
AllianceBernsteinForFor *Against
Hartford FundsForNo reportNo report
DWSForFor *Against
PIMCOForFor *Against
AllspringSplit or no voteSplit or no voteSplit or no vote
MassMutualForFor *Against
Harbor FundsForFor *Against
VirtusForAgainstAgainst
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForNo reportNo report
Janus HendersonForNo reportNo report
Neuberger BermanForNo reportNo report
American BeaconForFor *Against
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForFor *Against
Lord AbbettForFor *Against
BairdForNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

By season

SeasonFilers reportingAgainst management on pay, filersBy reported sharesSay-on-pay split
year to 30 June 202484910.5%withheld
year to 30 June 202588510.3%1.9%
year to 30 June 20269407.7%4.1%

Category mix

Share of the vote records reported for this company, by the category filers chose.

CategoryVote recordsShare
DIRECTOR ELECTIONS17,46462.9%
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES4,34515.6%
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE3,62013.0%
AUDIT-RELATED2,0377.3%
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES2761.0%
COMPENSATION300.1%

Questions

How did large funds vote at Domino's Pizza, Inc.?

For the year to 30 June 2026, 898 Form N-PX filers reported a say-on-pay vote at Domino's Pizza, Inc.; 69 voted against management (7.7%). The table on this page lists the position of each of the largest fund families on say-on-pay and on each shareholder proposal that could be told apart in the filings.

Were there shareholder proposals at Domino's Pizza, Inc.?

Filers reported 2 proposals from security holders that could be told apart in the year to 30 June 2026. Across them, 27.2% of reporting filers voted for at the median proposal.

Is this the meeting result?

No. The figures are shares of the funds and managers that file Form N-PX, and of the shares they reported. Holders that do not file the form (individuals, most foreign investors, insiders) are not included, so the split here can differ widely from the certified result, which Domino's Pizza, Inc. reports on Form 8-K.

Where does the data come from?

From Form N-PX filings on the SEC's EDGAR system, grouped by company. Filers type company names and meeting dates themselves; this site groups spellings of the same company and folds meeting dates up to three days apart. Data runs through 23 Sep 2026; the median compares 3,799 companies.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings that list Domino's Pizza, Inc., grouped by company. The name is the most common spelling among filers; the ticker and SEC company number come from the SEC company tickers file, matched on the exact name. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026; page built 26 Sep 2026.