Home / Companies / EDP SA / 16 Apr 2026
EDP SA: meeting of 16 Apr 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
158 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the EDP SA meeting of 16 Apr 2026. Their records fall into 10 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
218 vote records from 47 filers. 2 of the 40 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 7 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
268 vote records from 141 filers. 0 of the 136 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
34 vote records from 10 filers. 0 of the 10 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,291 vote records from 140 filers. 0 of the 135 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
438 vote records from 134 filers. 0 of the 129 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
440 vote records from 123 filers. 0 of the 121 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
220 vote records from 19 filers. 0 of the 16 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Appraise Management of Company and Approve Vote of Confidence to Executive Board
176 vote records from 93 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 92 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Appraise Supervision of Company and Approve Vote of Confidence to Supervisory Board
176 vote records from 93 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 92 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
176 vote records from 93 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 92 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Say-on-pay | 2. Auditor | 8. Proposal | 9. Proposal | 10. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | No report | For | For | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Fidelity | No report | For | For | For | For |
| Dimensional | No report | For | For | For | For |
| State Street and SPDR | No report | For | For | For | For |
| American Century | No report | For | For | For | For |
| Franklin Templeton | No report | For | For | For | For |
| Invesco | No report | For | For | For | For |
| Equitable | No report | For | For | For | For |
| Charles Schwab | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | No report | For | For | For | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | No report | For | For | For | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | For | For |
| Goldman Sachs | No report | For | For | For | For |
| WisdomTree | No report | For | For | For | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | For | For |
| SEI | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| T. Rowe Price | No report | For | For | For | For |
| Thrivent | No report | For | For | For | For |
| Lincoln Financial | No report | For | For | For | For |
| Voya | No report | For | For | For | For |
| First Trust | No report | For | For | For | For |
| Russell Investments | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Nationwide | No report | For | For | For | For |
| Victory Capital | No report | For | For | For | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | No report | For | For | For | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | No report | For | For | For | For |
| BNY Mellon | No report | For | For | For | For |
| Principal | No report | For | For | For | For |
| Global X | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| MFS | No report | For | For | For | For |
| Transamerica | No report | For | For | For | For |
| Federated Hermes | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | For | For | For | For |
| Hartford Funds | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| PIMCO | No report | For | For | For | For |
| Allspring | No report | For | For | For | For |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Virtus | No report | For | For | For | For |
| VanEck | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | Against * | For | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the EDP SA meeting?
158 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 16 Apr 2026. On say-on-pay, 2 of 40 voted against management (5.0%). 3 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by EDP SA on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for EDP SA
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing EDP SA with a meeting date within three days of 16 Apr 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.