Home / Companies / Exxon Mobil Corporation / 27 May 2026
Exxon Mobil Corporation: meeting of 27 May 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
589 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Exxon Mobil Corporation meeting of 27 May 2026. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
12 nominees; 99.4% of reported votes for; 13 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
9,624 vote records from 291 filers. 0 of the 291 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
1,249 vote records from 587 filers. 56 of the 583 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
801 vote records from 291 filers. 0 of the 291 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONSIssuer
EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONS: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
802 vote records from 291 filers. 154 of the 291 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
802 vote records from 291 filers. 31 of the 291 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Proposal requesting Company to modify its Voluntary Retail Voting Program to provide multiple options not...
802 vote records from 291 filers. 156 of the 291 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 5. Proposal | 6. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against | Abstain or withhold * |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | Against * | For | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | Against * | For | Against | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | For | For * | For * |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| MFS | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| DWS | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| PIMCO | For | For | For | For * | For * |
| Allspring | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | For * | For * |
| Virtus | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Janus Henderson | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| American Beacon | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Lord Abbett | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Cohen & Steers | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Dodge & Cox | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Artisan Partners | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Exxon Mobil Corporation meeting?
589 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 27 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 56 of 583 voted against management (9.6%). 2 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Exxon Mobil Corporation on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Exxon Mobil Corporation
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Exxon Mobil Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 27 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.